Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32793885›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Multiomics profiling of paired primary and recurrent glioblastoma patient tissues.

Lennard J M Dekker, Nynke M Kannegieter, Femke Haerkens, Emma Toth, Johan M Kros, Dag Are Steenhoff Hov, Julien Fillebeen, Lars Verschuren, Sieger Leenstra, Anna Ressa and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lennard J M DekkerDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Nynke M KannegieterPepscope BV, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Femke HaerkensPepscope BV, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Emma TothDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Johan M KrosDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dag Are Steenhoff HovPubGene AS, Oslo, Norway.
Julien FillebeenPubGene AS, Oslo, Norway.
Lars VerschurenDepartment of Microbiology and Systems Biology, The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Zeist, The Netherlands.
Sieger LeenstraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Anna RessaPepscope BV, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Theo M LuiderDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLPubGene (Norway) · NONetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite maximal therapy with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, glioblastoma (GBM) patients have a median survival of only 15 months. Almost all patients inevitably experience symptomatic tumor recurrence. A hallmark of this tumor type is the large heterogeneity between patients and within tumors itself which relates to the failure of standardized tumor treatment. In this study, tissue samples of paired primary and recurrent GBM tumors were investigated to identify individual factors related to tumor progression.

methodsPaired primary and recurrent GBM tumor tissues from 8 patients were investigated with a multiomics approach using transcriptomics, proteomics, and phosphoproteomics.

resultsIn the studied patient cohort, large variations between and within patients are observed for all omics analyses. A few pathways affected at the different omics levels partly overlapped if patients are analyzed at the individual level, such as synaptogenesis (containing the SNARE complex) and cholesterol metabolism. Phosphoproteomics revealed increased STMN1(S38) phosphorylation as part of ERBB4 signaling. A pathway tool has been developed to visualize and compare different omics datasets per patient and showed potential therapeutic drugs, such as abobotulinumtoxinA (synaptogenesis) and afatinib (ERBB4 signaling). Afatinib is currently in clinical trials for GBM.

conclusionsA large variation on all omics levels exists between and within GBM patients. Therefore, it will be rather unlikely to find a drug treatment that would fit all patients. Instead, a multiomics approach offers the potential to identify affected pathways on the individual patient level and select treatment options.

Indexed as

glioblastomamultiomicsphosphoproteomicstranscriptomicstumor progression

Identifiers

PMID32793885
PMCPMC7415260
OpenAlexW3038468005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.