Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32793850›Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2020

Food Insecurity Is Associated with Increased Risk of Obesity in US College Students.

Aseel El Zein, Sarah E Colby, Wenjun Zhou, Karla P Shelnutt, Geoffrey W Greene, Tanya M Horacek, Melissa D Olfert, Anne E Mathews

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02941497 ("Get Fruved), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02941497 naunknown statusnot on this map

"Get Fruved:" A Peer-led, Train-the-trainer Social Marketing Intervention to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Prevent Childhood Obesity.

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleRan2014 to 2020Enrolled5,800ConditionsObesityArmsSocial marketing and health promotion campaign
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Empirical Dietary Patterns Associated with Food Insecurity in U.S. Cancer Survivors: NHANES 1999-2018.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Aseel El ZeinFood Science and Human Nutrition Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Sarah E ColbyDepartment of Nutrition, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Wenjun ZhouDepartment of Business Analytics and Statistics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Karla P ShelnuttDepartment of Family, Youth, and Community Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Geoffrey W GreeneDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA.
Tanya M HoracekNutrition Science and Dietetics, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Melissa D OlfertDivision of Animal and Nutritional Sciences, Davis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Design, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Anne E MathewsFood Science and Human Nutrition Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
University of Florida · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · USSyracuse University · USUniversity of Rhode Island · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood insecurity affects millions of Americans and college students are especially vulnerable. Little is known about the relation of food insecurity with weight status and dietary intake during this critical phase of emerging adulthood.

objectivesWe aimed to examine the sex-specific associations of food insecurity with obesity and dietary intake among college students. The study also explored these associations by meal plan (MP) enrollment.

methodsThis cross-sectional study included 683 second-year students at 8 universities in the United States. Food security status and dietary intake were assessed using the USDA Adult Food Security Survey and the Dietary Screener Questionnaire, respectively. On-site anthropometrics were measured by researchers.

resultsThe prevalence of food insecurity at the universities ranged from 19.0% to 34.1% with a mean of 25.4% for the entire sample. Compared with high food security, marginal food security and food insecurity were associated with 3.16 (95% CI: 1.55, 6.46) and 5.13 (95% CI: 2.63, 10.00) times increased odds of obesity, respectively, exhibiting a dose-response relation. Food insecurity remained a significant predictor of obesity among both sexes after adjusting for sociodemographic variables. Food-insecure (FI) students had a significantly lower intake of fruits and vegetables and higher intake of added sugars than food-secure (FS) students. Obesity rate and added sugars consumption were higher among FI students with MPs than among FI students lacking MPs and FS students regardless of MP status. Among students with MPs, FS students had a higher intake of fruits and vegetables than FI students.

conclusionsFood insecurity was associated with obesity and poor dietary intake among both sexes. Although MP subsidies may be a reasoned approach to combat food insecurity, it should be coupled with efforts to assist students in making healthy food choices.Registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02941497.

Indexed as

college studentsdietary intakefood insecuritymeal planobesitysex

Identifiers

PMID32793850
PMCPMC7408225
OpenAlexW3043528403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.