ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2020
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the mechanisms of protective effect of high-energy X-ray FLASH radiotherapy on intestine through multi omics analysis.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Distinct immune responses to proton and photon radiotherapy: implications for anti-PD-L1 combination therapy in colorectal cancer.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of Flattening-Filter-Free versus Flattened Beams in V79 and Glioblastoma Patient-Derived Stem-like Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Anti-PD-1/Anti-PD-L1 Drugs and Radiation Therapy: Combinations and Optimization Strategies.Cancers · 2021Review
- Impact of high-dose rate radiotherapy on B and natural killer (NK) cell polarization in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) via inducing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-derived exosomes.Translational cancer research · 2021Article
- Impact of proton therapy on antitumor immune response.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionModern accelerators have the "flattening filter-free" (FFF) technique to deliver RT with a moderate high-dose rate, currently used in limited clinical indications. No scientifically established data are currently available on the possible effects of this high dose rate on the anti-tumor immune response. We therefore propose here to study these effects in a preclinical CT26 murine colorectal tumor model. MATERIAL AND
methods
results
conclusionIn this study involving the CT26 model, no influence of a moderate high dose rate in FFF technique on the anti-tumor immune response was demonstrated, which would make studies of associations between RT and checkpoint inhibitors fit with this technique of RT. However, further explorations using other cellular models seem to be of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.