Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32793784›Full record

ArticleData in brief2020

A bluetooth low energy dataset for the analysis of social interactions with commercial devices.

Michele Girolami, Fabio Mavilia, Franca Delmastro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michele GirolamiInstitute of Information Science and Technologies, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
Fabio MaviliaInstitute of Information Science and Technologies, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
Franca DelmastroInstitute of Informatics and Telematics, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes a data collection campaign and a dataset of BLE beacons for detecting and analysing human social interactions. The dataset has been collected by involving 15 volunteers that interacted in indoor environments for a total of 11 hours of activity. The dataset is released as a collection of CSV files with a timestamp, RSSI (Received Signal Strength Indicator) and a unique identifier of the emitting and of the receiving devices. Volunteers wear a wristband equipped with BLE tags emitting beacons at a fixed rate, and a mobile application able to collect and to store beacons. We organized 6 interaction sessions, designed to reproduce the three common stages of an interaction (Non Interaction, Approaching and Interaction). Moreover, we reproduced interactions by varying the volunteer's posture as well as the position of the receiving device. The dataset is released with a ground truth annotation reporting the exact time intervals during which volunteers actually interacted. The combination of such factors, provides a rich dataset useful to experiment algorithms for detecting interactions and for analyzing dynamics of interactions in a real-world setting. We present in detail the dataset and its evaluation in "Sensing Social Interactions through BLE Beacons and Commercial Mobile Devices", in which we focus on two orthogonal analysis: quality of the dataset and RSSI symmetry of the channel during the interaction stage between pairs of users.

Indexed as

Bluetooth low energyCo-locationSocial interactionsSocial sensing

Identifiers

PMID32793784
PMCPMC7408333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.