ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2020
Family physician model in the health system of selected countries: A comparative study summary.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the utility of artificial intelligence throughout the triage outpatients: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Trial
- Challenges in Managing Noncommunicable Diseases: Perspectives of Family Physicians Practicing in Public‒Private Partnerships: A Qualitative Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Facilitators and barriers to chronic non-communicable disease management under family doctor contracting services in China.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Barriers and challenges of establishing family physician policy for urban population; evidence from a qualitative study in Iran.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2024Article
- Article
- The challenges of urban family physician program over the past decade in Iran: a scoping review and qualitative study with policy-makers.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2023Article
- Snapshot of family medicine around the world: Introducing the global family medicine website.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023Article
- General practice in the EU: countries you see, customs you find.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023Article
- The role of general practitioners in the EU: time to draw lessons from a too wide range?Internal and emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Financial challenges in the family physician programme in Iran: A systematic review of qualitative research.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2023Review
- Near Two Decades of the Family Physician Program in Iran and the Structural Challenges: A Systematic Review.International journal of preventive medicine · 2023Review
- Prevalence and pattern of acute and chronic multimorbidity across all body systems and age groups in primary health care.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The use of virtual tools in narrowing the impact of health disparities in neurology.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Concept of family physician is required to relaunch in post Covid19 era for Urban India.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2021Article
- The influential factors for achieving universal health coverage in Iran: a multimethod study.BMC health services research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the 21
aimThe purpose of this study is to compare the model of implementation of family physician program (FPP) in the United States, England, Germany, Singapore, Turkey, Egypt, and Iran. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is a comparative study that examines the model of family physician implementation in selected countries. Data for each country were gathered from the valid databases, were compared according to the comparative table, and analyzed by a framework approach. In order to assure the validity of data, the researchers referred to the websites of the selected nations' Ministry of Health and also cross-checked the findings with reports published by the World Health Organization.
resultsIn this study, we used the Control Knobs framework to compare countries' FPPs because the framework can demonstrate all necessary features of national health system programs. This framework includes governance and organization, regulation, financing, payment, and behavior in each country. The results of this study show that although the principles of FPP in the selected countries are almost common, they use different methods in FPP implementation.
conclusionsAs the success of any policy depends on the political, economic, social, and cultural context of each country, considering these factors and reinforcing each of the control knobs are critical to the success of the family physician's policy implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.