Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32793746›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2020

Invadopodia: clearing the way for cancer cell invasion.

Katarzyna Augoff, Anita Hryniewicz-Jankowska, Renata Tabola

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Autophagy in Ovarian Cancer, an Opportunity or an Additional Threat?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Decoding Rho GTPase signalling networks in directed cell migration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  8. The Duality of Collagens in Metastases of Solid Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Cancer cell dynamics on silica fibers.Scientific reports · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Cancer cell extravasation requiresBritish journal of cancer · 2024
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katarzyna AugoffDepartment of Surgical Education, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Anita Hryniewicz-JankowskaDepartment of Cytobiochemistry, Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland.
Renata TabolaSecond Department and Clinic of General and Oncological Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Wroclaw Medical University · PLUniversity of Wrocław · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The invasive nature of many cancer cells involves the formation of F-actin-based, lipid-raft-enriched membrane protrusions known as invadopodia or, more broadly, invadosomes. Invadopodia are specialized adhesive structures arising from ventral cell surface within cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) contacts and concentrate high proteolytic activities that allow cells to overcome the dense scaffold of local microenvironment, comprising a natural barrier to cell spreading. This degradative activity distinguishes invadopodia from other adhesive structures like focal adhesions, lamellipodia or filopodia, and is believed to drive cancer progression.

Indexed as

cancer invasionInvadopodialipid raftmetalloproteasesmetastasisserine protease

Identifiers

PMID32793746
PMCPMC7396792
OpenAlexW3016237604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.