Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32793705›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2020

Minimum local anesthetic dose of ropivacaine in real-time ultrasound-guided intraspinal anesthesia for lower extremity surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Ting Zheng, Peng Ye, Weilan Wu, Bin Hu, Lifei Chen, Xiaochun Zheng, Mingxue Lin

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ting ZhengDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Peng YeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Weilan WuDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Bin HuDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Lifei ChenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Xiaochun ZhengDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Mingxue LinDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Fujian Medical University · CNFujian Provincial Hospital · CNBeijing Friendship Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the many advantages real-time ultrasound-guided lumbar anesthesia has over traditional lumbar anesthesia, it seemingly involves a much higher dose of ropivacaine. This study aimed to determine the minimum local anesthetic dose (MLAD) and the 95% confidence interval of ropivacaine at different concentrations in real-time ultrasound-guided lumbar anesthesia for lower extremity surgery.

methodsA total of 60 patients who were consecutively scheduled for selective lower extremity surgery were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, which each received different concentrations of ropivacaine at different initial dosages when Dixon's up-and-down sequential method was applied. The high ropivacaine group and the low ropivacaine group received 0.75% and 0.5% ropivacaine, respectively. The patients' baseline characteristics, the MLAD, and the 95% confidence interval were assessed. The highest level of sensory block, time to reach the T10 sensory block, duration for sensory blocks higher than T10, highest plane for sensory block, and onset time and duration for motor block were recorded. Comparisons were also made between the patients' vital signs and adverse reactions.

resultsThe minimum local anaesthetic dose (MLAD) and 95% confidence interval in the high ropivacaine group and the low ropivacaine group were 17.176 (16.276 to 18.124) and 20.192 (19.256 to 21.174) mg, respectively. Moreover, motor block maintenance was greatly reduced in the 0.5% ropivacaine compared to the 0.75% ropivacaine group (P=0.0309).

conclusionsIn real-time ultrasound-guided intraspinal anesthesia for lower extremity surgery, both 0.75% and 0.5% ropivacaine provide satisfactory anesthesia. Our results suggest that shortened motor block duration can hold benefits for patients including earlier mobilization and a quicker rehabilitation process.

Indexed as

Lower extremityminimum local anaesthetic dose (MLAD)ropivacainespinal anesthesia, ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID32793705
PMCPMC7396769
OpenAlexW3042895051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.