ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2020
Complications associated with mechanical circulatory support.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity score-matched studies.Intensive care medicine · 2024Pooled it
- ECMO and Impella Support Strategies as a Bridge to Surgical Repair of Post-Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Pooled it
- Predictors of Bleeding After Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device Support: Findings From the J-PVAD Registry.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Bleeding Rates With Sodium Bicarbonate Versus Heparin-Based Purge Solutions for Impella CP and 5.5 Ventricular Assist Devices.Artificial organs · 2026Article
- Sex-Specific Trends in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Use as Bridge to Orthotopic Heart Transplant.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Anesthetic Management in Patients with Impella Devices: A Retrospective Review and Clinical Guide.Annals of cardiac anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Unplanned Mechanical Circulatory Support as Hemodynamic Rescue Worsens Outcomes in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- High profile transvalvular microaxial flow pump as a bridge to heart transplantation for amyloid cardiomyopathy: A case series.JHLT open · 2025Article
- A Biophysics-Based Mathematical Model of Shear-Induced Platelet Activation and Receptor Shedding: Re-Examining Previous Experimental Data.ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992) · 2025Article
- Left Ventricular Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock After Myocardial Infarction.Cardiology and therapy · 2025Review
- Bridging to orthotopic heart transplant: Reducing the risk of intra-operative blood loss.JHLT open · 2025Article
- Left atrial veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to surgical or percutaneous closure of post-myocardial infarction ventriculoseptal defects: a case series.European heart journal. Case reports · 2025Article
- Clinical Features and Physiological Signals Fusion Network for Mechanical Circulatory Support Need Prediction in Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2025Article
- Catheter ablation in patients on mechanical circulatory supports for cardiogenic shock.PloS one · 2025Article
- Trends and outcomes of different mechanical circulatory support modalities for acute myocardial infarction associated cardiogenic shock in patients undergoing early revascularization.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024Article
- Preoperative Impella therapy in patients with ventricular septal rupture and cardiogenic shock: haemodynamic and organ function outcomes.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Levosimendan, a Promising Pharmacotherapy in Cardiogenic Shock: A Comprehensive Review.European cardiology · 2024Review
- Mechanical Support Strategies for High-Risk Procedures in the Invasive Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Anticoagulation practices and complications associated with Impella® support at an advanced cardiac center in the Middle East gulf region.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There has been a significant increase in the utilisation of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices for the management of cardiogenic shock over recent years, with new devices being developed and introduced with the aim of improving outcomes for this group of patients. MCS devices may be used as a bridge to recovery or transplantation or intended as a destination therapy. Although these devices are not without their complications, good outcomes are achieved, but not without risk of significant complications. In this article, the complications of MCS devices have been reviewed, including the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), Impella, TandemHeart, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and ventricular assist devices (VAD)-temporary and durable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.