ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2020
Short-term mechanical circulatory support (intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, TandemHeart): a review.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Failure of Tricuspid Bioprosthetic Valve After Concomitant Use With a Continuous Flow Temporary Right Heart Pump.Artificial organs · 2026Article
- Comparative Outcomes of Direct Impella Use vs. Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP)-to- Impella Escalation Strategy in Cardiogenic Shock: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample.Research square · 2026Article
- Interventional strategies for pulmonary arterial hypertension: Current perspectives and future directions.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Review
- Contemporary Mechanical Support Devices for Temporary and Long-Term Applications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cardiogenic Shock Management in the Modern Era: A Narrative Review of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Left ventricular unloading in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.European heart journal open · 2025Article
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Cardiogenic Shock: Current Evidence, Clinical Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Eosinophilic myocarditis due to parasitic infection: A case-based minireview.World journal of cardiology · 2025Review
- Minimally invasive, transapical dual-lumened cannula for short-term left ventricular support in a clinically relevant large animal model†.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025Article
- Unveiling the hidden risk: a case of severe jaundice triggered by intra-aortic balloon pump after cardiac surgery.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Novel Applications of a Percutaneous Dual-Lumen Cannula Beyond a Right Ventricular Assist Device.Case reports in transplantation · 2025Article
- Cardiac preservation usingFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Left ventricular unloading to facilitate ventricular remodelling in heart failure: A narrative review of mechanical circulatory support.Experimental physiology · 2024Review
- Versatility of ImpellaThe Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2024Article
- Impact of mechanical circulatory support on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes stratified by vasoactive-inotropic score: A retrospective cohort study.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Preoperative Impella therapy in patients with ventricular septal rupture and cardiogenic shock: haemodynamic and organ function outcomes.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Bridge to Life: Current Landscape of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Heart-Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Impact of Left Ventricular Unloading on Outcome of Heart Transplant Bridging With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support in New Allocation Policy.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- [Progress in the analysis of hemolysis and coagulation models for interventional micro-axial flow blood pumps].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2024Review
- Prognosis of cardiogenic shock with and without acute myocardial infarction: results from a prospective, monocentric registry.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality for patients with acute myocardial infarction and advanced heart failure. Intra-aortic balloon pump has been the most widely used short-term mechanical circulatory support device to rapidly stabilize hemodynamics. However, it provides modest support, current evidence does not show a decrease in mortality, and the latest guidelines no longer recommend its routine use. Several percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices have been introduced into clinical practice (Impella, extracorporeal membrane oxygen, TandemHeart), providing a greater level of hemodynamic support. These resource-intensive devices demand a careful selection of patients that stand to benefit the most. Premature initiation of mechanical circulatory support exposes the patient to unnecessary risk, whereas delaying therapy leads to irreversible end-organ injury, rendering any intervention medically futile. Cannulation methods, pump designs, and circuit configurations differ between devices, as do the adverse effects and physiological impact on the myocardium, which needs to be factored into consideration before deployment on the patient in cardiogenic shock. This article will review the commonly used percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices in the setting of cardiogenic shock, compare their advantages and disadvantages, evaluate key clinical trials, and discuss a practical approach to guide clinicians' decision and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.