ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020
From Microbial Communities to Distributed Computing Systems.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Engineering microbial consortia for distributed signal processing.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Why cellular computations challenge our design principles.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2025Review
- Partitioning of a 2-bit hash function across 66 communicating cells.Nature chemical biology · 2025Article
- Engineered Bacteria as Living Biosensors in Dermal Tattoos.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Emergent digital bio-computation through spatial diffusion and engineered bacteria.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Engineering a scalable and orthogonal platform for synthetic communication in mammalian cells.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Addressable and adaptable intercellular communication via DNA messaging.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Probing patterning in microbial consortia with a cellular automaton for spatial organisation.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A synthetic distributed genetic multi-bit counter.iScience · 2021Article
- Emergent spatiotemporal population dynamics with cell-length control of synthetic microbial consortia.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Directed Evolution of Microbial Communities.Annual review of biophysics · 2021Review
- paraSBOLv: a foundation for standard-compliant genetic design visualization tools.Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Biofilm and swarming emergent behaviours controlled through the aid of biophysical understanding and tools.Biochemical Society transactions · 2020Review
- FlopR: An Open Source Software Package for Calibration and Normalization of Plate Reader and Flow Cytometry Data.ACS synthetic biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A distributed biological system can be defined as a system whose components are located in different subpopulations, which communicate and coordinate their actions through interpopulation messages and interactions. We see that distributed systems are pervasive in nature, performing computation across all scales, from microbial communities to a flock of birds. We often observe that information processing within communities exhibits a complexity far greater than any single organism. Synthetic biology is an area of research which aims to design and build synthetic biological machines from biological parts to perform a defined function, in a manner similar to the engineering disciplines. However, the field has reached a bottleneck in the complexity of the genetic networks that we can implement using monocultures, facing constraints from metabolic burden and genetic interference. This makes building distributed biological systems an attractive prospect for synthetic biology that would alleviate these constraints and allow us to expand the applications of our systems into areas including complex biosensing and diagnostic tools, bioprocess control and the monitoring of industrial processes. In this review we will discuss the fundamental limitations we face when engineering functionality with a monoculture, and the key areas where distributed systems can provide an advantage. We cite evidence from natural systems that support arguments in favor of distributed systems to overcome the limitations of monocultures. Following this we conduct a comprehensive overview of the synthetic communities that have been built to date, and the components that have been used. The potential computational capabilities of communities are discussed, along with some of the applications that these will be useful for. We discuss some of the challenges with building co-cultures, including the problem of competitive exclusion and maintenance of desired community composition. Finally, we assess computational frameworks currently available to aide in the design of microbial communities and identify areas where we lack the necessary tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.