ArticleThe Korean journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2020
Stricture Following Esophageal Reconstruction.
Article in The Korean journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- OTSC combined with jejunal mucosal ESD for closure of jejunal dilated blind pouch and anastomotic metal stent placement in the treatment of post-oesophagojejunostomy stricture: a case report (with video).Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The Rule for Good Anastomosis: A Golden Ratio Between Thickness and Diameter.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Value of Postsurgical Endoscopy.Visceral medicine · 2025Review
- A practical approach to the post esophagectomy CT: expected postoperative anatomy and anatomical approach to associated complication.Emergency radiology · 2025Review
- Article
- Retrosternal Colonic Bypass for Intractable Esophagogastric Anastomotic Stricture Post-Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy.Cureus · 2024Article
- The Effect of Laparoscopic Gastric Ischemic Preconditioning Prior to Esophagectomy on Anastomotic Stricture Rate and Comparison with Esophagectomy-Alone Controls.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Comparison of wide and narrow gastric conduit in esophageal cancer surgery.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2023Article
- Dysphagia After Esophageal Replacement and Its Treatment.Dysphagia · 2023Article
- Which Anastomotic Techniques Is the Best Choice for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Owing to varying clinical definitions of anastomotic stricture following esophageal reconstruction, its reported incidence rate varies from 10% to 56%. Strictures adversely impact patients' quality of life. Risk factors, such as the anastomosis method, leakage, ischemia, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and underlying disease have been mentioned, but conflicting information has been reported. Balloon dilation is regarded as a safe and effective treatment method for patients with benign anastomotic strictures. Reoperations are seldom required. The etiology and management of anastomotic strictures are reviewed in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.