ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2020
Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Application of magnetism in tissue regeneration: recent progress and future prospects.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Review
- GTKO rabbit: A novel animal model for preclinical assessment of decellularized xenogeneic grafts via in situ implantation.Materials today. Bio · 2023Article
- Induction of Corneal Epithelial Differentiation of Induced Pluripotent and Orbital Fat-Derived Stem Cells Seeded on Decellularized Human Corneas.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2022Article
- Construction of Artificial Ovaries with Decellularized Porcine Scaffold and Its Elicited Immune Response after Xenotransplantation in Mice.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
- Immunological Risk Assessment of Xenogeneic Dural Patch by Comparing with Raw Material via GTKO Mice.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Decellularization for the retention of tissue niches.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The xenogeneic decellularized corneal matrix (DCM) was expected to be used in lamellar keratoplasty in clinic as the substitute of allogeneic cornea. After decellularization treatment, the remaining risk of xenograft rejection needed to be assessed. The galactose-α1,3-galactose, as the most abundant and closely rejection-related xenogeneic antigen, should be one of the important factors concerned in immunological evaluation. In this study, residual αGal in the DCM was first determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method with qualified accuracy and specificity. Then the DCM was implanted subcutaneously into the α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout (GTKO) mice, accompanied by the implantation in the wild-type C57BL/6 mice as a comparison. The total serum antibody levels, anti-Gal antibody levels, inflammatory cytokines and ratios of splenic lymphocyte subtypes were detected and the histopathological analysis of implants were performed to systematically evaluate the immune responses. The experimental result showed the fresh porcine corneal matrix samples had (9.90 ± 1.54) × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.