ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2020
The practice of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in Jordan: A clinical outcome study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Congenital anomalies observed in children conceived through assisted reproductive technology-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Pooled it
- A Comparative Study of the Respiratory Neonatal Outcomes Utilizing Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate versus a Mixture of Betamethasone Dipropionate and Betamethasone Sodium Phosphate as an Antenatal Corticosteroid Therapy.International journal of general medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe lack of appropriate guidelines and justified practice in most developing countries is a serious limitation to efforts to qualify the services provided. In this paper, we evaluate and assess the clinical practice of an assisted reproductive technique of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in Jordan.
methodsRetrospectively, we identified women who achieved a successful pregnancy by ICSI over a period of ten years. Information related to the ICSI procedure, foetus abnormalities, maternal complications and delivery outcomes were included. A control group of normal pregnancies were incorporated.
resultsIn total, 291 cases were included as successful cases of ICSI with a success rate of 14.1%. For the control group, 466 pregnant women with normal pregnancies were included. No statistical difference was observed between both groups in foetus malformation. In normal pregnancy women, 42.1% delivered through caesarean section (CS) while 87.6% of ICSI patients underwent CS. Women with ICSI had significantly higher rates of multiple gestations, and their neonates were lower in birthweight. Women in the ICSI group tended to deliver females compared to the control group. Pregnancy-related hypertension was more commonly reported in the normal pregnancy group, while gestational diabetes, antepartum haemorrhage and preterm labour were more common in ICSI group.
conclusionServices for the management of infertility are increasing in the Middle East. The clinical outcomes in Jordan is approaching that of other developed regions, although the success rate is lower than in other regions. Further studies and efforts should be carried out to maximize effective and successful practice in such low-income areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.