Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32793169›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

Comparison of Whole Genome (wg-) and Core Genome (cg-) MLST (BioNumerics

Dominique S Blanc, Bárbara Magalhães, Isabelle Koenig, Laurence Senn, Bruno Grandbastien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Enhanced Spread of Carbapenem-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Veterinary Clinics as Reservoirs forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dominique S BlancService of Hospital Preventive Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bárbara MagalhãesService of Hospital Preventive Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Isabelle KoenigService of Hospital Preventive Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Laurence SennService of Hospital Preventive Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bruno GrandbastienService of Hospital Preventive Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is increasingly used for epidemiological investigations of pathogens. While SNP variant calling is currently considered as the most suitable method, the choice of a representative reference genome and the isolate dependency of results limit standardization and affect resolution in an unknown manner. Whole or core genome Multi Locus Sequence Typing (wg-, cg-MLST) represents an attractive alternative. Here, we assess the accuracy of wg- and cg-MLST by comparing results of four

Indexed as

cgMLSTevaluationmolecular typingPseudomonas aeruginosawgMLSTwhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32793169
PMCPMC7387498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.