Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32793162›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

Diversity and Composition of the Gut Microbiota in the Developmental Stages of the Dung Beetle

Pablo Suárez-Moo, Magdalena Cruz-Rosales, Enrique Ibarra-Laclette, Damaris Desgarennes, Carmen Huerta, Araceli Lamelas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Metagenomes and metagenome-assembled genomes fromMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pablo Suárez-MooRed de Estudios Moleculares Avanzados, Instituto de Ecología A.C., Xalapa, Mexico.
Magdalena Cruz-RosalesRed de Ecoetología, Instituto de Ecología A.C., Xalapa, Mexico.
Enrique Ibarra-LacletteRed de Estudios Moleculares Avanzados, Instituto de Ecología A.C., Xalapa, Mexico.
Damaris DesgarennesRed de Biodiversidad y Sistemática, Instituto de Ecología A.C., Xalapa, Mexico.
Carmen HuertaRed de Ecoetología, Instituto de Ecología A.C., Xalapa, Mexico.
Araceli LamelasRed de Estudios Moleculares Avanzados, Instituto de Ecología A.C., Xalapa, Mexico.
Instituto de Ecología · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dung beetles are holometabolous insects that feed on herbivorous mammal dung and provide services to the ecosystem including nutrient cycling and soil fertilization. It has been suggested that organisms developing on incomplete diets such as dungs require the association with microorganisms for the synthesis and utilization of nutrients. We describe the diversity and composition of the gut-microbiota during the life cycle of the dung beetle

Indexed as

developmental stagesdung beetlesgut microbiotaKOsPICRUSt2 analysis

Identifiers

PMID32793162
PMCPMC7393143
OpenAlexW3045330627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.