Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32793153›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2020

Criteria to Qualify Microorganisms as "Probiotic" in Foods and Dietary Supplements.

Sylvie Binda, Colin Hill, Eric Johansen, David Obis, Bruno Pot, Mary Ellen Sanders, Annie Tremblay, Arthur C Ouwehand

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 235 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
235citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

235 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

175 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sylvie BindaDanone Nutricia Research, Palaiseau Cedex, France.
Colin HillAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Eric JohansenEmerging Technologies, Chr. Hansen A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark.
David ObisDanone Nutricia Research, Palaiseau Cedex, France.
Bruno PotScience Europe, Yakult Europe BV, Almere, Netherlands.
Mary Ellen SandersInternational Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics, Centennial, CO, United States.
Annie TremblayRosell Institute for Microbiome and Probiotics, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Arthur C OuwehandGlobal Health and Nutrition Sciences, DuPont Nutrition and Biosciences, Kantvik, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Still relevant after 19 years, the FAO/WHO definition of probiotics can be translated into four simple and pragmatic criteria allowing one to conclude if specific strains of microorganisms qualify as a probiotic for use in foods and dietary supplements. Probiotic strains must be (i) sufficiently characterized; (ii) safe for the intended use; (iii) supported by at least one positive human clinical trial conducted according to generally accepted scientific standards or as per recommendations and provisions of local/national authorities when applicable; and (iv) alive in the product at an efficacious dose throughout shelf life. We provide clarity and detail how each of these four criteria can be assessed. The wide adoption of these criteria is necessary to ensure the proper use of the word probiotic in scientific publications, on product labels, and in communications with regulators and the general public.

Indexed as

Bifidobacteriumcriterionhealth efficacyidentificationLactobacilluslive microbesprobiotic definitionsafety

Identifiers

PMID32793153
PMCPMC7394020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.