Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32792956›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2020

Assessing the Selectivity of FXR, LXRs, CAR, and RORγ Pharmaceutical Ligands With Reporter Cell Lines.

Lucia Toporova, Marina Grimaldi, Abdelhay Boulahtouf, Patrick Balaguer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A comprehensive transcriptome characterization of individual nuclear receptor pathways in the human small intestine.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lucia ToporovaInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, ICM, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Marina GrimaldiInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, ICM, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Abdelhay BoulahtoufInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, ICM, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Patrick BalaguerInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, ICM, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Inserm · FRInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To characterize human nuclear receptor (NR) specificity of synthetic pharmaceutical chemicals we established stable cell lines expressing the ligand binding domains (LBDs) of human FXR, LXRα, LXRβ, CAR, and RORγ fused to the yeast GAL4 DNA binding domain (DBD). As we have already done for human PXR, a two-step transfection procedure was used. HeLa cells stably expressing a Gal4 responsive gene (HG5LN cell line) were transfected by Gal4-NRs expressing plasmids. At first, using these cell lines as well as the HG5LN PXR cells, we demonstrated that the basal activities varied from weak (FXR and LXRs), intermediate (PXR), to strong (CAR and RORγ), reflecting the recruitment of HeLa co-regulators in absence of ligand. Secondly, we finely characterized the activities of commercially available FXR, LXRα, LXRβ, CAR, RORγ, and PXR agonists/antagonists GW4064, feraxamine, DY268, T0901317, GW3965, WAY252623, SR9238, SR9243, GSK2033, CITCO, CINPA1, PK11195, S07662, SR1078, SR0987, SR1001, SR2211, XY018, clotrimazole, dabrafenib, SR12813, and SPA70, respectively. Among these compounds we revealed both, receptor specific agonists/antagonists, as well as less selective ligands, activating or inhibiting several nuclear receptors. FXR ligands manifested high receptor selectivity. Vice versa, LXR ligands behaved in non-selective manner, all activating at least PXR. CAR was selectively influenced by their ligands, while it also responded to several LXR ligands. Finally, although PXR was quite selectively activated or antagonized by its own ligands, it responded to several NRs ligands as well. Thus, using these reporter cell lines enabled us to precisely characterize the selectivity of pharmaceutical ligands for different nuclear receptors.

Indexed as

agonismantagonismbasal activitynuclear receptorsreporter cell linesselectivity

Identifiers

PMID32792956
PMCPMC7394005
OpenAlexW3044789585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.