Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32792818›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical dentistry

Comparative Evaluation of the Remineralizing Potential of Commercially Available Agents on Artificially Demineralized Human Enamel: An

Chintan Joshi, Uma Gohil, Vaishali Parekh, Surabhi Joshi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biomimetic remineralization of enamel and dentin with chicken eggshell slurry: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Nano-Hydroxyapatite (nHAp) in the Remineralization of Early Dental Caries: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chintan JoshiDepartment of Conservative and Endodontics, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Uma GohilDepartment of Conservative and Endodontics, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Vaishali ParekhDepartment of Conservative and Endodontics, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Surabhi JoshiDepartment of Periodontics, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaries is highly prevalent multifactorial disease, but its progression can be prevented in the initial stage of demineralization through remineralization (RML). Various materials have been proposed for the same, successful outcome can prove to be a boon in the prevention of caries.

aimThe aim of the study is to assess the RML potential of four commercially available agents so as to restore the enamel closest to its previous microhardness levels. MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty permanent intact premolars were randomly divided into six groups: Four test groups - (1) bioactive glass (BAG) Novamin (SHY-NM), (2) nano-hydroxyapatite (nHAp) (Acclaim), (3) functionalized tricalcium phosphate (f-TCP) (Clinpro Tooth Crème), and (4) grape seed extract (GSE); one positive control - (5) fluoride (1000 ppm) containing dentifrice (Colgate Calci-Lock); and one negative control - (6) distilled water. The samples were initially evaluated for baseline surface microhardness (SMH); later on, these samples were placed in the demineralizing solution for 48 h in an incubator at 37°C, and postdemineralization again SMH was measured. Thereafter, the samples were subjected to the pH cycling for consecutive 21 days, and SMH was recorded. The SMH was evaluated using a Vickers microhardness tester. Statistical analysis was done using a

resultsBAG Novamin showed SMH recovery at 96.75% followed by f-TCP at 95.83%, nHAp at 90.88%, and GSE at 48.71%. Statistically significant differences were observed between the first three groups and the rest of the groups after RML stage.

conclusionBAG Novamin, f-TCP, and nHAp showed considerable RML followed to a lesser extent by GSE.

Indexed as

Bioactive glasscalcium phosphatefluoridemicrohardnessnano-hydroxyapatitepH-cyclingremineralization

Identifiers

PMID32792818
PMCPMC7390429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.