ArticleScientific reports2020
Responses of active soil microorganisms facing to a soil biostimulant input compared to plant legacy effects.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mineral Nitrogen Transformation and Microorganism Responses Affected by Organic and Biological Amendment in Intensive Cropping System.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Interactive roles of mineralogy, microbial community composition and litter quality in regulating organic matter turnover.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A prebiotic-based biostimulant enhances growth parameters, photosynthetic efficiency, and grain yield in rice (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Belgian endive-derived biostimulant activity inFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Marine and terrestrial biostimulant elicitors of tolerance to cold stress.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Yield and Fruit Characteristics of Tomato Crops Grown with Mineral Macronutrients: Impact of Organo-Mineral Fertilizers through Foliar or Soil Applications.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Mineral-mediated stability of organic carbon in soil and relevant interaction mechanisms.Eco-Environment & Health · 2024Review
- Microbial Exudates as Biostimulants: Role in Plant Growth Promotion and Stress Mitigation.Journal of xenobiotics · 2023Review
- Brown Seaweed Extract (BSE) Application Influences Auxin- and ABA-Related Gene Expression, Root Development, and Sugar Yield inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Morpho-Anatomical, Physiological, and Mineral Composition Responses Induced by a Vegetal-Based Biostimulant at Three Rates of Foliar Application in Greenhouse Lettuce.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Use of Biostimulants: Towards Sustainable Approach to Enhance Durum Wheat Performances.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Agronomical valorization of eluates from the industrial production of microorganisms: Chemical, microbiological, and ecotoxicological assessment of a novel putative biostimulant.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Microbial Biostimulants as Response to Modern Agriculture Needs: Composition, Role and Application of These Innovative Products.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Transcriptional and Physiological Analyses to Assess the Effects of a Novel Biostimulant in Tomato.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Agriculture is changing to rely on agroecological practices that take into account biodiversity, and the ecological processes occurring in soils. The use of agricultural biostimulants has emerged as a valid alternative to chemicals to indirectly sustain plant growth and productivity. Certain BS have been shown to select and stimulate plant beneficial soil microorganisms. However, there is a lack of knowledge on the effects and way of action of the biostimulants operating on soil functioning as well as on the extent and dynamic of these effects. In this study we aimed to decipher the way of action of a seaweed and amino-acids based biostimulant intended to be applied on soil crop residues to increase their microbial mineralization and the further release of nutrients. By setting-up a two-phase experiment (soil plant-growing and soil incubation), our objectives were to (1) determine the effects of the soil biostimulant over time on the active soil bacteria and fungi and the consequences on the organic carbon mineralization in bare soils, and (2) assess the biostimulant effects on soil microorganisms relatively to plant legacy effects in planted soils. We demonstrated that the soil biostimulant had a delayed effect on the active soil microorganisms and activated both plant growth promoting bacteria and saprophytes microorganisms at the medium-term of 49 days. However, the changes in the abundances of active microbial decomposers were not associated to a higher mineralization rate of organic carbon derived from soil and/or litter. The present study assessed the biostimulant beneficial effect on active soil microbial communities as similar as or even higher than the legacy effects of either A. thaliana or T. aestivum plants. We specifically showed that the biostimulant increased the active fungal richness to a higher extent than observed in soils that previously grew the two plants tested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.