Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32792599›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2021

Molecular characterization of invasive and in situ squamous neoplasia of the vulva and implications for morphologic diagnosis and outcome.

Basile Tessier-Cloutier, Jennifer Pors, Emily Thompson, Julie Ho, Leah Prentice, Melissa McConechy, Rosalia Aguirre-Hernandez, Ruth Miller, Samuel Leung, Lily Proctor and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Scientific Progress and Impacts to Pathology Practice.International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Viruses · 2023
    Article
  11. Next-generation sequencing in dermatology.Frontiers in medicine · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. 2020 WHO Classification of Female Genital Tumors.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Molecular Landscape of Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Assessment of TSPAN Expression Profile and Their Role in the VSCC Prognosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Basile Tessier-CloutierVancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8739-3879
Jennifer PorsVancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8675-916X
Emily ThompsonMolecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1486-3304
Julie HoVancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Leah PrenticeContextual Genomics, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Melissa McConechyContextual Genomics, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Rosalia Aguirre-HernandezContextual Genomics, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ruth MillerContextual Genomics, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Samuel LeungGenetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Lily ProctorDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jessica N McAlpineDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
David G HuntsmanMolecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
C Blake GilksVancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Lynn N HoangVancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Lien.Hoang@vch.ca.
University of British Columbia · CACentre for Advancing Health Outcomes · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-independent vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) is an aggressive clinical entity. Current diagnostic guidelines for premalignant lesions are ambiguous, and their molecular profile and progression events are still unclear. We selected 75 samples, from 40 patients, including 33 VSCC, 8 verrucous carcinomas (VC), 13 differentiated-type vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN), 11 suspicious for dVIN (?dVIN), 6 differentiated exophytic vulvar intraepithelial lesions (DE-VIL), 2 vulvar acanthosis with altered differentiation (VAAD), and 2 usual-type vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (uVIN/HSIL). Invasive and precursor lesions were matched in 29 cases. Clinical information, p16 immunohistochemistry, and mutation analysis were performed on all lesions. All dVIN, ?dVIN, DE-VIL, and VAAD were p16 negative, all uVIN/HSIL were p16 positive. In the HPV-independent group, mutations were identified in 6 genes: TP53 (n = 40), PIK3CA (n = 20), HRAS (n = 12), MET (n = 5), PTEN (n = 4), and BRAF (n = 1). TP53 mutations occurred in 73% (22/30) VSCC, 85% (11/13) dVIN, 70% (7/10) ?dVIN and no VC (0/8), DE-VIL (0/6) nor VAAD (0/2). Basal atypia was the only reliable feature of TP53 mutations. ?dVIN lesions that were non-acanthotic and atypical but obscured by inflammation, all harbored TP53 mutations. In lesions without TP53 mutations, PIK3CA (50% VC, 33% DE-VIL, 100% VAAD, 40% VSCC) and HRAS (63% VC, 33% DE-VIL, 0% VAAD, 20% VSCC) mutations were found. Mutational progression from in situ to invasive was seen (7/26, 27%) and usually involved TP53 (4/26, 15%). Cases with TP53 and PIK3CA co-mutations had the worse clinical outcomes (p < 0.001). We recommend testing for p53 in all HPV-independent lesions suspicious for dVIN, even in the presence of marked inflammation or non-acanthotic skin, particularly when close to a margin. VC, VAAD, and DE-VIL, were almost never mutated for TP53, but instead often harbored PIK3CA and HRAS mutations. In VSCC, combined TP53 and PIK3CA mutations may inform prognosis.

Indexed as

Carcinoma in SituCarcinoma, Squamous CellClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesFemaleHumansPapillomavirus InfectionsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Vulvar NeoplasmsClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID32792599
OpenAlexW3048930560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.