Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32792597›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2021

Activation of the RAS pathway through uncommon BRAF mutations in mucinous pancreatic cysts without KRAS mutation.

Rongqin Ren, Somashekar G Krishna, Wei Chen, Wendy L Frankel, Rulong Shen, Weiqiang Zhao, Matthew R Avenarius, Jason Garee, Sean Caruthers, Dan Jones

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluating the prognostic efficacy of biomarkers in pancreatic cyst fluid.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. BRAFScience advances · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Pancreatic Incidentaloma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rongqin RenJames Molecular Laboratory at Polaris, The Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA. Rongqin.Ren@osumc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0473-4322
Somashekar G KrishnaDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5748-7890
Wei ChenDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9028-622X
Wendy L FrankelDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Rulong ShenDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Weiqiang ZhaoJames Molecular Laboratory at Polaris, The Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Matthew R AvenariusJames Molecular Laboratory at Polaris, The Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jason GareeJames Molecular Laboratory at Polaris, The Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Sean CaruthersJames Molecular Laboratory at Polaris, The Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Dan JonesJames Molecular Laboratory at Polaris, The Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnostic testing of pancreatic cyst fluid obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has traditionally utilized elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (≥192 ng/ml) and cytomorphologic examination to differentiate premalignant mucinous from benign pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). Molecular testing for KRAS/GNAS mutations has been shown to improve accuracy of detecting mucinous PCLs. Using a targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel, we assess the status of PCL-associated mutations to improve understanding of the key diagnostic variables. Molecular analysis of cyst fluid was performed on 108 PCLs that had concurrent CEA and/or cytological analysis. A 48-gene NGS assay was utilized, which included genes commonly mutated in mucinous PCLs such as GNAS, KRAS, CDKN2A, and TP53. KRAS and/or GNAS mutations were seen in 59 of 68 (86.8%) cases with multimodality diagnosis of a mucinous PCL. Among 31 patients where surgical histopathology was available, the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of NGS for the diagnosis of mucinous PCL was 88.5%, 100%, and 90.3%, respectively. Cytology with mucinous/atypical findings were found in only 29 of 62 cases (46.8%), with fluid CEA elevated in 33 of 58 cases (56.9%). Multiple KRAS mutations at different variant allele frequencies were seen in seven cases favoring multiclonal patterns, with six of them showing at least two separate PCLs by imaging. Among the 6 of 10 cases with GNAS + /KRAS- results, uncommon, non-V600E exon 11/15 hotspot BRAF mutations were identified. The expected high degree of accuracy of NGS detection of KRAS and/or GNAS mutations for mucinous-PCLs, as compared with CEA and cytological examination, was demonstrated. Multiple KRAS mutations correlated with multifocal cysts demonstrated by radiology. In IPMNs that lacked KRAS mutations, the concurring BRAF mutations with GNAS mutations supports an alternate mechanism of activation in the Ras pathway.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersCyst FluidDNA Mutational AnalysisEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationPancreatic CystProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Sensitivity and SpecificitySignal TransductionBiomarkersBRAF protein, humanKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID32792597
OpenAlexW3048892011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.