Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32792543›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Antibiotic use and hygiene interact to influence the distribution of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in low-income communities in Guatemala.

Brooke M Ramay, Mark A Caudell, Celia Cordón-Rosales, L Diego Archila, Guy H Palmer, Claudia Jarquin, Purificación Moreno, John P McCracken, Leah Rosenkrantz, Ofer Amram and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Brooke M Ramay *Center for Health Studies, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, 181 Avenida 11-95, Guatemala City, 01015, Guatemala.
Mark A Caudell *Paul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
Celia Cordón-RosalesCenter for Health Studies, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, 181 Avenida 11-95, Guatemala City, 01015, Guatemala. ccordon@ces.uvg.edu.gt.
L Diego ArchilaCenter for Health Studies, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, 181 Avenida 11-95, Guatemala City, 01015, Guatemala.
Guy H PalmerPaul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
Claudia JarquinCenter for Health Studies, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, 181 Avenida 11-95, Guatemala City, 01015, Guatemala.
Purificación MorenoCenter for Health Studies, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, 181 Avenida 11-95, Guatemala City, 01015, Guatemala.
John P McCrackenCenter for Health Studies, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, 181 Avenida 11-95, Guatemala City, 01015, Guatemala.
Leah RosenkrantzDepartment of Geography, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada.
Ofer AmramPaul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
Sylvia OmuloPaul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
Douglas R CallPaul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
Universidad del Valle de Guatemala · GTWashington State University · USSimon Fraser University · CAUnited Nations · USWashington State University Spokane · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To examine the effects of poor sanitation and hygiene on the prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, we surveyed households in two rural and two urban communities in Guatemala (N = 196 randomly selected households). One adult (≥ 18-years old) and, when available, one child (≤ 5 years-old) provided a stool sample. Up to 48 presumptive Escherichia coli isolates were collected from each stool sample (n = 21,256 total) and were subjected to breakpoint assays for ten antibiotics. Mixed-effects logistic models were used to identify potential factors influencing the likelihood of harboring antibiotic-resistant bacteria. For nine out of ten antibiotics, the odds of detecting resistant bacteria decreased by ~ 32% (odds ratios, OR 0.53-0.8, P < 0.001) for every unit of improvement of a hygiene scale. Hygiene differences between households had a greater impact on prevalence compared to antibiotic use differences. The likelihood of detecting resistant isolates was lower for five antibiotics among households that boiled raw milk before consumption (OR 0.31-0.69), and higher for nine antibiotics in urban households (OR > 1.89-9.6). Poor hygiene conditions likely obscure effects of individual antibiotic use, presumably due to enhanced microbial transmission. Consequently, efforts to improve antibiotic stewardship should be coupled with improving hygiene conditions.

Indexed as

HygienePovertyAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsChild, PreschoolDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsGuatemalaHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPublic HealthResidence CharacteristicsSanitationSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID32792543
PMCPMC7426860
OpenAlexW3048849061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.