Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32792523›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Single-trial cross-area neural population dynamics during long-term skill learning.

T L Veuthey, K Derosier, S Kondapavulur, K Ganguly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Circuit Organization of the Forelimb-Related M2-to-M1 Corticocortical Pathway in the Mouse.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Subspace communication in the hippocampal-retrosplenial axis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

T L Veuthey *Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
K Derosier *Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9350-8115
S KondapavulurMedical Scientist Training Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4412-5978
K GangulyNeurology and Rehabilitation Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA. karunesh.ganguly@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2570-9943

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007618 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ANDERSON, MARK S · 1985 to 2020
$29.6M
Optimizing peripheral stimulation parameters to modulate the sensorimotor cortex for post-stroke motor recoveryR01MH111871 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GANGULY, KARUNESH · 2016 to 2019
$2.0M
Development of circuit-based therapies for motor recovery after strokeK02NS093014 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GANGULY, KARUNESH · 2015 to 2019
$921k
Neurophysiological Basis for Enhancing Motor Recovery After StrokeI01RX001640 · VA · VETERANS AFFAIRS MED CTR SAN FRANCISCO · PI Karunesh Ganguly · 2016 to 2026
–
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007618NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111871NINDS NIH HHS K02 NS093014RRD VA I01 RX001640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammalian cortex has both local and cross-area connections, suggesting vital roles for both local and cross-area neural population dynamics in cortically-dependent tasks, like movement learning. Prior studies of movement learning have focused on how single-area population dynamics change during short-term adaptation. It is unclear how cross-area dynamics contribute to movement learning, particularly long-term learning and skill acquisition. Using simultaneous recordings of rodent motor (M1) and premotor (M2) cortex and computational methods, we show how cross-area activity patterns evolve during reach-to-grasp learning in rats. The emergence of reach-related modulation in cross-area activity correlates with skill acquisition, and single-trial modulation in cross-area activity predicts reaction time and reach duration. Local M2 neural activity precedes local M1 activity, supporting top-down hierarchy between the regions. M2 inactivation preferentially affects cross-area dynamics and behavior, with minimal disruption of local M1 dynamics. Together, these results indicate that cross-area population dynamics are necessary for learned motor skills.

Indexed as

AnimalsElectrophysiologyLearningMaleMotor CortexNeurophysiologyPopulation DynamicsRatsReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID32792523
PMCPMC7426952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.