ArticleBMJ open2020
Implementing post-discharge care following acute kidney injury in England: a single-centre qualitative evaluation.
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Top ten tips to manage patients after acute kidney injury.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Implementing the Acute Kidney Injury in Care Transitions (ACT) Program: Results From a Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.Kidney medicine · 2026Article
- Holistic Patient-Centered Outcomes in Post-Acute Kidney Injury Care: Physical, Emotional, Cognitive, and Social Outcomes.Advances in kidney disease and health · 2025Review
- Acute Kidney Injury Provider and Survivor Education: Current and Emerging Tools.Advances in kidney disease and health · 2025Review
- Nephrologist's Perceptions of Risk of Severe Chronic Kidney Disease and Outpatient Follow-up After Hospitalization With AKI: Multinational Randomized Survey Study.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2025Article
- Acute Kidney Injury Survivor Remote Patient Monitoring: A Single Center's Experience and an Effectiveness Evaluation.Kidney medicine · 2024Article
- Conceptualization of Remote Patient Monitoring Program for Patients with Complex Medical Illness on Hospital Dismissal.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2023Article
- Editorial: Multidisciplinary critical care medicine - Getting things done across specialties.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- What Do Acute Kidney Injury Survivors Want to Know About Their Condition: A Qualitative Study.Kidney medicine · 2022Article
- An mHealth App-Based Self-management Intervention for Family Members of Pediatric Transplant Recipients (myFAMI): Framework Design and Development Study.JMIR nursing · 2022Article
- Discharge Documentation and Follow-Up of Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury Treated With Kidney Replacement Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Post-discharge care following acute kidney injury: quality improvement in primary care.BMJ open quality · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe sought to understand the factors influencing the implementation of a primary care intervention to improve post-discharge care following acute kidney injury (AKI).
designQualitative study using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis.
settingGeneral practices in one Clinical Commissioning Group area in England.
participantsA total of 18 healthcare staff took part in interviews. Participants were practice pharmacists, general practitioners, practice managers and administrators involved in implementing the intervention.
resultsWe identified three main factors influencing implementation: differentiation of the new intervention from other practice work; development of skill mix and communication across organisations. Overall, post-AKI processes of care were deemed straightforward to embed into existing practice. However, it was also important to separate the intervention from other work in general practice. Dedicating staff time to proactively identify AKI on discharge summaries and to coordinate the provision of care enabled implementation of the intervention. The post-AKI intervention provided an opportunity for practice pharmacists to expand their primary care role. Working in a new setting also brought challenges; time to develop trusting relationships including an understanding of boundaries of clinical expertise influenced pharmacists' roles. Unclear and inconsistent information on discharge summaries contributed to concerns about additional work in primary care.
conclusionsThe research highlights challenges around post-discharge management in the primary care context. Coordination and communication were key factors for improving follow-up care following AKI. Further consideration is required to understand patient experiences of the interface between secondary and primary care. The issues pertaining to discharge care following AKI are relevant to practitioners and commissioners as they work to improve transitions of care for vulnerable patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.