Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32792409›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2020

An analysis of clinical predictive values for radiographic pneumonia in children.

Chris A Rees, Sudha Basnet, Angela Gentile, Bradford D Gessner, Cissy B Kartasasmita, Marilla Lucero, Luis Martinez, Kerry-Ann F O'Grady, Raul O Ruvinsky, Claudia Turner and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Antibiotic resistance ofFrontiers in public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 14 institutions in 11 countries.

Chris A ReesDivision of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6449-0377
Sudha BasnetCenter for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Angela GentileDepartment of Epidemiology, "R. Gutiérrez" Children's Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Bradford D GessnerPfizer Vaccines, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Cissy B KartasasmitaDepartment of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.
Marilla LuceroResearch Institute for Tropical Medicine, Manila, Philippines.
Luis MartinezPNUD/National University, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Kerry-Ann F O'GradyInstitute of Health & Biomedical Innovation @ Centre for Children's Health Research, Queensland University of Technology, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Raul O RuvinskyDirección de Control de Enfermedades Inmunoprevenibles, Ministerio de Salud de la Nación, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Claudia TurnerShoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mae Sot, Thailand.
Harry CampbellCentre for Global Health, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Harish NairCentre for Global Health, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Jennifer FalconerInstitute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Linda J WilliamsCentre for Global Health, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Margaret HorneCentre for Global Health, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Tor StrandResearch Department, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer, Norway.
Yasir B NisarDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Shamim A QaziDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health (Retired), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mark I NeumanDivision of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA mark.neuman@childrens.harvard.edu.
World Health Organization PREPARE study group
Centre for Global Health Research · CABoston Children's Hospital · USWorld Health Organization · CHHospital General de Niños Ricardo Gutierrez · ARInnlandet Hospital Trust · NOMinisterio de Salud · ARPadjadjaran University · IDPfizer (United States) · USQueen Margaret University · GBQueensland University of Technology · AUResearch Institute for Tropical Medicine · PHShoklo Malaria Research Unit · THUniversidad de Montevideo · UYUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealthcare providers in resource-limited settings rely on the presence of tachypnoea and chest indrawing to establish a diagnosis of pneumonia in children. We aimed to determine the test characteristics of commonly assessed signs and symptoms for the radiographic diagnosis of pneumonia in children 0-59 months of age.

methodsWe conducted an analysis using patient-level pooled data from 41 shared datasets of paediatric pneumonia. We included hospital-based studies in which >80% of children had chest radiography performed. Primary endpoint pneumonia (presence of dense opacity occupying a portion or entire lobe of the lung or presence of pleural effusion on chest radiograph) was used as the reference criterion radiographic standard. We assessed the sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios for clinical findings, and combinations of findings, for the diagnosis of primary endpoint pneumonia among children 0-59 months of age.

resultsTen studies met inclusion criteria comprising 15 029 children; 24.9% (n=3743) had radiographic pneumonia. The presence of age-based tachypnoea demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.92 and a specificity of 0.22 while lower chest indrawing revealed a sensitivity of 0.74 and specificity of 0.15 for the diagnosis of radiographic pneumonia. The sensitivity and specificity for oxygen saturation <90% was 0.40 and 0.67, respectively, and was 0.17 and 0.88 for oxygen saturation <85%. Specificity was improved when individual clinical factors such as tachypnoea, fever and hypoxaemia were combined, however, the sensitivity was lower.

conclusionsNo single sign or symptom was strongly associated with radiographic primary end point pneumonia in children. Performance characteristics were improved by combining individual signs and symptoms.

Indexed as

PneumoniaChildHumansRadiographySensitivity and Specificitychild healthpneumonia

Identifiers

PMID32792409
PMCPMC7430338
OpenAlexW3046192401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.