Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32792034›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2020

Understanding increasing rates of psychiatric hospital detentions in England: development and preliminary testing of an explanatory model.

Luke Sheridan Rains, Scott Weich, Clementine Maddock, Shubulade Smith, Patrick Keown, David Crepaz-Keay, Swaran P Singh, Rebecca Jones, James Kirkbride, Lottie Millett and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Abolition of coercion in psychiatry on the horizon? A descriptive ecologic data study from six European countries.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Article
  7. Ensuring compulsory treatment is used as a last resort: a narrative review of the knowledge about Community Treatment Orders.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Luke Sheridan RainsDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.
Scott WeichProfessor, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK.
Clementine MaddockSwansea Bay University Health Board, UK.
Shubulade SmithBehavioural and Developmental Disorders Directorate, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, London; and Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3797-6985
Patrick KeownNorthumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4727-5880
David Crepaz-KeayMental Health Foundation, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3845-4721
Swaran P SinghProfessor, Department of Mental Health and Wellbeing, University of Warwick, UK.
Rebecca JonesDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.
James KirkbrideDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3401-0824
Lottie MillettDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.
Natasha LyonsDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1635-0681
Stella Branthonne-FosterDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.
Sonia JohnsonProfessor, Division of Psychiatry, University College London; and Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Brynmor Lloyd-EvansAssociate Professor, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9866-788X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe steep rise in the rate of psychiatric hospital detentions in England is poorly understood.

aimsTo identify explanations for the rise in detentions in England since 1983; to test their plausibility and support from evidence; to develop an explanatory model for the rise in detentions.

methodHypotheses to explain the rise in detentions were identified from previous literature and stakeholder consultation. We explored associations between national indicators for potential explanatory variables and detention rates in an ecological study. Relevant research was scoped and the plausibility of each hypothesis was rated. Finally, a logic model was developed to illustrate likely contributory factors and pathways to the increase in detentions.

resultsSeventeen hypotheses related to social, service, legal and data-quality factors. Hypotheses supported by available evidence were: changes in legal approaches to patients without decision-making capacity but not actively objecting to admission; demographic changes; increasing psychiatric morbidity. Reductions in the availability or quality of community mental health services and changes in police practice may have contributed to the rise in detentions. Hypothesised factors not supported by evidence were: changes in community crisis care, compulsory community treatment and prescribing practice. Evidence was ambiguous or lacking for other explanations, including the impact of austerity measures and reductions in National Health Service in-patient bed numbers.

conclusionsBetter data are needed about the characteristics and service contexts of those detained. Our logic model highlights likely contributory factors to the rise in detentions in England, priorities for future research and potential policy targets for reducing detentions.

Indexed as

detentionsIn-patient treatmentmental health actpsychiatry and lawrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID32792034
PMCPMC7453796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.