Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32791972›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Barriers and facilitators of kangaroo mother care adoption in five Chinese hospitals: a qualitative study.

Jieya Yue, Jun Liu, Sarah Williams, Bo Zhang, Yingxi Zhao, Qiannan Zhang, Lin Zhang, Xin Liu, Stephen Wall, Greta Wetzel and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Jieya YuePeking University First Hospital, 1 Xi'anmen St, Xicheng, Beijing, China.
Jun LiuPeking University First Hospital, 1 Xi'anmen St, Xicheng, Beijing, China.
Sarah WilliamsSave the Children UK, London, UK.
Bo ZhangPeking University First Hospital, 1 Xi'anmen St, Xicheng, Beijing, China.
Yingxi ZhaoNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Qiannan ZhangPeking University First Hospital, 1 Xi'anmen St, Xicheng, Beijing, China.
Lin ZhangSave the Children, Chengdu, China.
Xin LiuPeking University First Hospital, 1 Xi'anmen St, Xicheng, Beijing, China.
Stephen WallSave the Children Saving Newborn Lives, Washington, DC, USA.
Greta WetzelSave the Children Saving Newborn Lives, Washington, DC, USA.
Gengli ZhaoPeking University First Hospital, 1 Xi'anmen St, Xicheng, Beijing, China. zhaogengli@sina.com.
Jennifer BoueyDepartment of International Health, School of Nursing and Health studies, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Peking University · CNPeking University First Hospital · CNSave the Children · USChengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital · CNGeorgetown University · USSave the Children · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Save the Children NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKangaroo mother care (KMC) has been proved to be a safe and cost-effective standard of care for preterm babies. China hasn't adopted the KMC practice widely until recently. We aim to assess barriers and facilitators of KMC adoption in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and postnatal wards in China.

methodsWe conducted clinical observations and semi-structured interviews with nurses, physicians, and parents who performed KMC in seven NICUs and postnatal wards housed in five hospitals in different provinces of China between August and September 2018. The interviews provided first-hand stakeholder perspectives on barriers and facilitators of KMC implementation and sustainability. We further explored health system's readiness and families' willingness to sustain KMC practice following its pilot introduction. We coded data for emerging themes related to financial barriers, parent- and hospital-level perceived barriers, and facilitators of KMC adoption, specifically those unique in the Chinese context.

resultsFive hospitals with KMC pilot programs were selected for clinical observations and 38 semi-structured interviews were conducted. Common cultural barriers included concerns with the conflict with traditional postpartum confinement (Zuo-yue-zi) practice and grandparents' resistance, while a strong family support is a facilitator for KMC adoption. Some parents reported anxiety and guilt associated with having a preterm baby, which can be a parental-level barrier to KMC. Hospital-level factors such as fear of nosocomial infection and shortage of staff and spaces impeded the KMC implementation, and supportive community and peer group organized by the hospital contributed to KMC uptake. Financial barriers included lodging costs for caregivers and supply costs for hospitals.

conclusionsWe provided a comprehensive in-depth report on the multi-level KMC barriers and facilitators in China. We recommend policy interventions specifically addressing these barriers and facilitators and increase family and peer support to improve KMC adoption in China. We also recommend that well-designed local cultural and economic feasibility and acceptability studies should be conducted before the KMC uptake.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityChinaHospitalsHospital UnitsHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalKangaroo-Mother Care MethodPostnatal CareQualitative ResearchChinaImplementation researchKangaroo mother careQualitative

Identifiers

PMID32791972
PMCPMC7427278
OpenAlexW3048508069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.