Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32791969›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2020

Patient distrust in pharmaceutical companies: an explanation for women under-representation in respiratory clinical trials?

Laurie Pahus, Carey Meredith Suehs, Laurence Halimi, Arnaud Bourdin, Pascal Chanez, Dany Jaffuel, Julie Marciano, Anne-Sophie Gamez, Isabelle Vachier, Nicolas Molinari

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03098303 (Criteria Associated With Patient Willingness to Participate in Biomedical Research), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03098303 completednot on this map

Criteria Associated With Patient Willingness to Participate in Biomedical Research: a Prospective, Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MontpellierRan2014 to 2016Enrolled1,000ConditionsConsulting in Pneumology Department, But Not for Oncology or Tobacology
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Expanding the boundaries of previously obtained informed consent in research: Views from participants in the Personalised Risk-based Mammascreening study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. The Ethics of Decentralized Clinical Trials and Informed Consent: Taking Technologies' Soft Impacts into Account.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Using provocative design to foster electronic informed consent innovation.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Laurie PahusAix Marseille Univ, APHM, Hôpital NORD, CIC 9502, Clinique des bronches allergies et sommeil, Chemin des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France. Laurie.pahus@ap-hm.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-5265-2874
Carey Meredith SuehsDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Univ Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Laurence HalimiDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Univ Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Arnaud BourdinDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Univ Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Pascal ChanezAix Marseille Univ, APHM, Hôpital NORD, CIC 9502, Clinique des bronches allergies et sommeil, Chemin des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France.
Dany JaffuelDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Univ Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Julie MarcianoClinique Générale de Marignane, Marignane, France.
Anne-Sophie GamezDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Univ Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Isabelle VachierDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Univ Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Nicolas MolinariIMAG, CNRS, Univ Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient skepticism concerning medical innovations can have major consequences for current public health and may threaten future progress, which greatly relies on clinical research. The primary objective of this study is to determine the variables associated with patient acceptation or refusal to participate in clinical research. Specifically, we sought to evaluate if distrust in pharmaceutical companies and associated psychosocial factors could represent a recruitment bias in clinical trials and thus threaten the applicability of their results.

methodsThis prospective, multicenter survey consisted in the administration of a self-questionnaire to patients during a pulmonology consultation. The 1025 questionnaires distributed collected demographics, socio-professional and basic health literacy characteristics. Patients were asked to rank their level of trust for pharmaceutical companies and indicate their willingness to participate in different categories of research (pre or post marketing, sponsored by an academic institution or pharmaceutical company). Logistic regression was used to determine factors contributing to "trust" versus "distrust" group membership and willingness to participate in each category of research.

resultsOne thousand patients completed the survey, corresponding to a response rate of 97.5%. Data from 838 patients were analyzed in this study. 48.3% of respondents declared that they trusted pharmaceutical companies, while 35.5% declared distrust. Being female (p = 0.042), inactive in the employment market(p = 0.007), and not-knowing the name of one's disease(p = 0.010) are factors related to declared distrust. Distrust-group membership is associated with unwillingness to participate in certain categories of trials such as pre-marketing and industry-sponsored trials.

conclusionDistrust in pharmaceutical companies is associated with a specific patient profile and with refusal to participate in certain subcategories of trials. This potential recruitment bias may explain the under-representation of certain categories of patients such as women in pre-marketing drug trials.

Indexed as

Pharmaceutical PreparationsTrustAltruismDrug IndustryFemaleHumansMarketingProspective StudiesPharmaceutical PreparationsClinical trialsExternal validityPatients’ distrustRecruitment biasUnder-representation of women

Identifiers

PMID32791969
PMCPMC7424561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.