ArticleBMC medical ethics2020
Patient distrust in pharmaceutical companies: an explanation for women under-representation in respiratory clinical trials?
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03098303 (Criteria Associated With Patient Willingness to Participate in Biomedical Research), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Criteria Associated With Patient Willingness to Participate in Biomedical Research: a Prospective, Observational Study
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expanding the boundaries of previously obtained informed consent in research: Views from participants in the Personalised Risk-based Mammascreening study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Trial
- Mapping the path to diversity in clinical trials: a qualitative study of community member and stakeholder perspectives.BMC public health · 2025Article
- The Ethics of Decentralized Clinical Trials and Informed Consent: Taking Technologies' Soft Impacts into Account.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2025Article
- Promoting Diversity through an Understanding of Barriers and Drivers for Inclusive Clinical Trials.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Article
- Evolving demographics of eligible patient population can impact enrollment of a biomarker clinical study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Representation of women in clinical trials supporting FDA-approval of contemporary cancer therapies.International journal of cancer · 2024Article
- Supporting diversity in clinical trials: the equitable breakthroughs in medicine site maturity model.Trials · 2024Article
- An exploration of the role of trust and rapport in enhancing vaccine uptake among Anishinaabe in rural northern Ontario.PloS one · 2024Article
- Vietnamese Americans' level of trust in sources of information and willingness to participate in COVID-19 clinical trials.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- The Constrained-Disorder Principle Assists in Overcoming Significant Challenges in Digital Health: Moving from "Nice to Have" to Mandatory Systems.Clinics and practice · 2023Review
- Patient-important outcomes in clinical trials of atopic diseases and asthma in the last decade: A systematic review.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2023Review
- Article
- Factors Associated With Public Trust in Pharmaceutical Manufacturers.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Diversity of Participation in Clinical Trials and Influencing Factors: Findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2020.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Observational
- Intention to participate in COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials in May 2021: a cross-sectional survey in the general French population.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Article
- Using provocative design to foster electronic informed consent innovation.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Role of Trusted Sources and Behavioral Beliefs in Promoting Mitigation Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survey Study.JMIR human factors · 2022Article
- Article
- Sacubitril-valsartan initiation in chronic heart failure patients impacts sleep apnea: the ENTRESTO-SAS study.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
- The UPTAKE study: implications for the future of COVID-19 vaccination trial recruitment in UK and beyond.Trials · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient skepticism concerning medical innovations can have major consequences for current public health and may threaten future progress, which greatly relies on clinical research. The primary objective of this study is to determine the variables associated with patient acceptation or refusal to participate in clinical research. Specifically, we sought to evaluate if distrust in pharmaceutical companies and associated psychosocial factors could represent a recruitment bias in clinical trials and thus threaten the applicability of their results.
methodsThis prospective, multicenter survey consisted in the administration of a self-questionnaire to patients during a pulmonology consultation. The 1025 questionnaires distributed collected demographics, socio-professional and basic health literacy characteristics. Patients were asked to rank their level of trust for pharmaceutical companies and indicate their willingness to participate in different categories of research (pre or post marketing, sponsored by an academic institution or pharmaceutical company). Logistic regression was used to determine factors contributing to "trust" versus "distrust" group membership and willingness to participate in each category of research.
resultsOne thousand patients completed the survey, corresponding to a response rate of 97.5%. Data from 838 patients were analyzed in this study. 48.3% of respondents declared that they trusted pharmaceutical companies, while 35.5% declared distrust. Being female (p = 0.042), inactive in the employment market(p = 0.007), and not-knowing the name of one's disease(p = 0.010) are factors related to declared distrust. Distrust-group membership is associated with unwillingness to participate in certain categories of trials such as pre-marketing and industry-sponsored trials.
conclusionDistrust in pharmaceutical companies is associated with a specific patient profile and with refusal to participate in certain subcategories of trials. This potential recruitment bias may explain the under-representation of certain categories of patients such as women in pre-marketing drug trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.