Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32791965›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2020

Impact of a preoperative pharmaceutical consultation in scheduled orthopedic surgery on admission: a prospective observational study.

Amélie Renaudin, Géraldine Leguelinel-Blache, Chloé Choukroun, Audrey Lefauconnier, Christophe Boisson, Jean-Marie Kinowski, Philippe Cuvillon, Hélène Richard

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Amélie RenaudinDepartment of Pharmacy, Nimes University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Place du Professeur Robert Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 9, France. amelie.renaudin@chu-nimes.fr.
Géraldine Leguelinel-BlacheDepartment of Pharmacy, Nimes University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Place du Professeur Robert Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 9, France.
Chloé ChoukrounDepartment of Pharmacy, Nimes University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Place du Professeur Robert Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 9, France.
Audrey LefauconnierDepartment of Anesthesia, Nimes University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Nimes, France.
Christophe BoissonDepartment of Anesthesia, Nimes University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Nimes, France.
Jean-Marie KinowskiDepartment of Pharmacy, Nimes University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Place du Professeur Robert Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 9, France.
Philippe CuvillonDepartment of Anesthesia, Nimes University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Nimes, France.
Hélène RichardDepartment of Pharmacy, Nimes University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Place du Professeur Robert Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 9, France.
Université de Montpellier · FRUniversité de Nîmes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes · FRInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier · FRNeuropsychiatrie : Recherche Epidemiologique et Clinique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication errors have a high prevalence in surgery and management of home medication is strongly involved in these errors. In scheduled surgery, the preoperative consultation is a privileged time to inform the patient about the management of her/his home medication before admission. This study assessed the impact of a pre-anesthesia best possible medication history (PA-BPMH) on admission. The PA-BPMH was performed by a clinical pharmacist prior to the anesthesia consultation for anesthesiologists to prescribe admission medical orders for scheduled orthopedic surgery patients.

methodsThis was a prospective observational study which was carried out in an orthopedic surgery department. All patients over 18 years old with an elective orthopedic surgery were eligible except ambulatory surgery patients. The pharmacist registered the PA-BPMH into the software making it available for anesthesiologists for the pre-admission medication order. Finally, a medication reconciliation was performed at admission. The main outcome was the percentage of patients with at least one unintended medication discrepancy (UMD) at admission. The nature, potential clinical impact and acceptance rate of each UMD detected were assessed. Also, the PA-BPMH process was described and patients and anesthesiologists satisfaction was evaluated.

resultsA total of 455 patients had a pharmaceutical consultation. Medication reconciliation was performed at admission for 360 patients. Overall, at least one UMD was observed in 13.0% of patients (n = 47). A total of 63 UMD were detected. The most common type of UMD was omission (25.4%) and incorrect drug (23.8%).Two UMD (3.2%) were evaluated as life threatening. All the UMD detected were corrected on the admission medication order.

conclusionA preoperative pharmacist-anesthesiologist teamwork seems to improve the safety of perioperative management of home medication for scheduled orthopedic surgery patients. This process needs a randomized clinical trial across a wider range of surgeries before its implementation.

Indexed as

Orthopedic ProceduresPharmacy Service, HospitalPreoperative CareReferral and ConsultationAgedFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansMaleMedication ErrorsMedication ReconciliationMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionProspective StudiesAnesthesiaDrug safetyMedication errorsMedication reconciliationPharmacySurgery

Identifiers

PMID32791965
PMCPMC7427279
OpenAlexW3049731415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.