ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2020
Challenges in early diagnosis of cancer: the fast track.
Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The implementation challenge of computerised clinical decision support systems for the detection of disease in primary care: systematic review and recommendations.Implementation science : IS · 2025Pooled it
- Portable single-step ethanolamine-functionalized boron-doped diamond immunosensor for dual detection of CEA and CYFRA 21-1.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Article
- Optimizing Lung Cancer Diagnostics: Insights from a Fast-Track Program in a Complex Healthcare Setting.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Time intervals in the pathway to diagnosis and treatment of patients with breast and gynecological cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Identification of SETD4 as an Onco-Immunological Biomarker Encompassing the Tumor Microenvironment, Prognoses, and Therapeutic Responses in Various Human Cancers.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2025Article
- Matrix Metalloproteinase-9: A Key Diagnostic Biomarker in Cancer Progression.Current drug targets · 2025Review
- Development of a Serum Metabolome-Based Test for Early-Stage Detection of Multiple Cancers.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Diagnostic process of cancer in a health system without gatekeeping: a single centre survey analysis.Primary health care research & development · 2024Article
- A non-invasive method for concurrent detection of multiple early-stage cancers in women.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Symptoms and signs of urogenital cancer in primary care.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- IgG N-glycan Signatures as Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Providers' Competencies and Management Practices for Traditional Palliative Cancer Care Service Delivery in Kenya.Health services insights · 2023Article
- Simple diagnosis of cancer by detecting CEA and CYFRA 21-1 in saliva using electronic sensors.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Pluralistic task shifting for a more timely cancer diagnosis. A grounded theory study from a primary care perspective.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2021Article
- From Raman to SESORRS: moving deeper into cancer detection and treatment monitoring.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2021Review
- Facilitators and barriers in diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis as described by general practitioners: a Danish study based on focus group interviews.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.