Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32791930›Full record

Observational studyLupus2020

Evaluation of belimumab treatment in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in a clinical practice setting: Results from a 24-month OBSErve study in Argentina.

A Babini, A M Cappuccio, C Caprarulo, G Casado, A Eimon, H Figueredo, M A García, S Magri, P Mannucci, S Perez Rodriguez and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Lupus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Lessons Learnt from the Belimumab Trials in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Observational
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

A BabiniHospital Italiano de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0141-1624
A M CappuccioHospital Dr Cesar Milstein, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
C CapraruloConsultorio Privado, Concordia, Entre Rios, Argentina.
G CasadoServicio de Reumatología, Hospital Militar Central, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
A EimonCEMIC, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
H FigueredoHospital de Alta Complejidad 'Pte. Juan Domingo Perón', Formosa, Argentina.
M A GarcíaHospital Interzonal General de Agudos José de San Martín, La Plata, Argentina.
S MagriHospital Italiano de La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
P MannucciAprillus Asistencia e Investigación de Arcis Salud SRL, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
S Perez RodriguezConsultorios Somnus, Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
B A Pons-EstelCentro Regional de Enfermedades Autoinmunes y Reumáticas (CREAR), Grupo Oroño, Sanatorio Parque, Rosario, Santa Fé, Argentina.
E J VelozoUnidad de Reumatologia, Universidad y Sanatorio Adventista del Plata, Entre Rios, Argentina.
M Iglesias-RodriguezImmuno-Inflammation and Future Pipeline, GSK, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
G StregerImmunology & Specialty Medicine, GSK, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas Norberto Quirno · ARHospital César Milstein · ARHospital Italiano La Plata · ARHospital Provincial de Rosario · ARNational University of General San Martín · ARServicio Diabetología Hospital Córdoba · ARUniversidad Adventista del Plata · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe clinical effectiveness of belimumab for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in real-world practice in Argentina.

methodsThis retrospective, observational study analysed medical record data of patients with SLE treated with belimumab in 15 centres in Argentina. Primary endpoint: overall clinical response (assessed on a scale similar to the 6-point Physician Global Assessment) at months 6, 12, 18 and 24, all versus index (belimumab initiation). Secondary endpoints: improvement in disease activity (SELENA-SLEDAI), SLE manifestations, and corticosteroid dose change.

resultsRecords for 81 patients (91% female) were analysed. Clinical improvements were reported for 95%, 95%, 98% and 100% patients at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post index, respectively. Mean SELENA-SLEDAI score decreased from 11.21 at index to 4.76, 3.77, 3.86 and 2.17 at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post index, respectively. Number of flares decreased from 1.05 at index to 0.21, 0.09, 0.22 and 0.30 at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post index, respectively. Mean corticosteroid dose was 14.59 mg/day at index, and 6.45, 5.18, 5.17 and 4.78 mg/day at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post index, respectively.

conclusionsReal-world patients with SLE treated with belimumab in Argentina demonstrated clinical improvements and reductions in corticosteroid dose.

Indexed as

Treatment OutcomeAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedArgentinaDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexAdrenal Cortex HormonesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedbelimumabImmunosuppressive AgentsBelimumabdisease activityobservational studyreal-worldsteroid sparingsystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID32791930
PMCPMC7536527
OpenAlexW3049673450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.