Observational studyMedicine2020
Can the severity of central lumbar stenosis affect the results of nerve conduction study?
Observational study in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- LASSO Logistic Regression was Used to Analyze the Risk Factors for Cauda Equina Injury Secondary to Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and to Build a Risk Model.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2025Article
- Can Foraminal Stenosis Due to Lumbar Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Cause Axonopathy in the Lower Extremity?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Findings of Electrodiagnostic Studies in Moderate to Severe Lumbar Central Spinal Stenosis-Electrodiagnostic Studies in Lumbar Central Spinal Stenosis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the effect of the severity of spinal stenosis on the peripheral nerves of lower extremities by nerve conduction study (NCS).One hundred fifteen patients with lumbar spinal stenosis were recruited retrospectively in this study. The grading system for lumbar stenosis was used based on the degree of separation of the cauda equina. The degree of cauda equina damage caused by lumbar central stenosis was assessed by NCS of peripheral nerves. Multiple regression analysis was used to estimate which factors affect peripheral nerve injury, according to the presence of DM, total grading of lumbar central stenosis, and age.Only age was associated with low amplitude in the tibial and peroneal motor NCS in the multiple regression analysis. The severity of the compression of the cauda equina, caused by spinal stenosis, did not statistically significantly affect the NCS values of nerves on the lower extremities.In conclusion, the cauda equina is resilient against degenerative lumbar central stenosis. Unlike changes caused by peripheral nerve entrapment, lumbar central stenosis did not affect the findings of NCS on the peripheral nerve of lower extremities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.