Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32791754›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Efficacy and safety of Lianhua Qingwen combined with conventional antiviral Western Medicine in the treatment of coronavirus disease (covid-19) in 2019: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xiaolin Zhang, Di Cao, Junnan Liu, Qi Zhang, Mingjun Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Insights into forsythia honeysuckle (Lianhuaqingwen) capsules: A Chinese herbal medicine repurposed for COVID-19 pandemic.Phytomedicine plus : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaolin ZhangChangchun University of Chinese Medicine.
Di CaoChangchun Hospital of Chinese Medicine.
Junnan LiuChangchun University of Chinese Medicine.
Qi ZhangChangchun University of Chinese Medicine.
Mingjun LiuChangchun University of Chinese Medicine.
Changchun University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) has spread to >200 countries and regions. There is no effective antiviral drug for COVID-19. Traditional Chinese medicine, such as Lianhua Qingwen, has achieved some curative effect in many countries, but its effect is not clear. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of Lianhua Qingwen combined with Conventional antiviral Western Medicine in Clinical treatment of COVID-19 or asymptomatic infection.

methodsThe following electronic bibliographic databases will be searched to identify relevant studies: CNKI, CBM, VIP and Wanfang databases, PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane central, and clinical trial registration centers, such as China Clinical Trial Registration Center (ChiCTR), Netherlands National Trial Registration Center (NTR) and clinical trials.gov. In addition, Manual retrieval of articles, conference papers, ongoing experiments, internal reports, among others, to supplement electronic retrieval. Select all eligible studies published before May 8, 2020.According to the Cochrane Handbook "bias risk" assessment tool, bias risk is independently assessed. The independent Newcastle Ottawa scale was used to conduct methodological quality assessment of nonrandomized trials. STATA15.1 and RevMan5.3 software were used to analyze meta outcomes of different intervention measures for the treatment of new crown pneumonia and the control group (conventional antiviral western medicine treatment) clinical efficacy.

resultsThis study will provide a relatively high-quality synthesis of current evidence of Lianhua Qingwen combined with Conventional antiviral Western Medicine in the treatment of COVID-19 from several aspects including the Clinical effective rate, CT improvement rate, severe conversion rate, antipyretic time, disappearance rate of fever symptoms, disappearance rate of cough symptoms, disappearance rate of asthenia symptoms, and adverse drug events.

conclusionThe conclusion of this review will provide evidence to judge whether Lianhua Qingwen combined with Conventional antiviral Western Medicine is an effective and safe intervention for COVID-19. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systemic review will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lianhua Qingwen combined with Conventional antiviral Western Medicine in the treatment of COVID-19. Since all the data included are published, the systematic review does not need ethical approval. INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY202060067.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusAntiviral AgentsCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentDrugs, Chinese HerbalDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPandemicsPneumonia, ViralResearch DesignSARS-CoV-2Systematic Reviews as TopicTreatment OutcomeAntiviral AgentsDrugs, Chinese Herballianhuaqingwen

Identifiers

PMID32791754
PMCPMC7387000
OpenAlexW3036373997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.