Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32791117›Full record

Observational studyThe Lancet. Global health2020

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic response on intrapartum care, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality outcomes in Nepal: a prospective observational study.

Ashish Kc, Rejina Gurung, Mary V Kinney, Avinash K Sunny, Md Moinuddin, Omkar Basnet, Prajwal Paudel, Pratiksha Bhattarai, Kalpana Subedi, Mahendra Prasad Shrestha and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Lancet. Global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 290 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
290citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
124.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

290 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 492 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Qualitative Exploration of Need for Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Care and Service Pathways Readiness During Pandemic in Nepal.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

230 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Ashish KcDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Society of Public Health Physicians Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal. Electronic address: ashish.k.c@kbh.uu.se.
Rejina GurungResearch Division, Golden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Mary V KinneySchool of Public Health, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa; Department of Global Health, Save the Children, Cape Town, South Africa.
Avinash K SunnyResearch Division, Golden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Md MoinuddinInstitute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK; Division of Maternal and Child Health, ICCDR,B, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Omkar BasnetResearch Division, Golden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Prajwal PaudelMinistry of Health and Population, Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Pratiksha BhattaraiResearch Division, Golden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Kalpana SubediMinistry of Health and Population, Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Mahendra Prasad ShresthaMinistry of Health and Population, Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Joy E LawnMaternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Mats MålqvistDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Nepal Development Research Institute · NPGovernment of Nepal · NPUppsala University · SELondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMinistry of Health and Population · NPUniversity College London · GBUniversity of the Western Cape · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic response is affecting maternal and neonatal health services all over the world. We aimed to assess the number of institutional births, their outcomes (institutional stillbirth and neonatal mortality rate), and quality of intrapartum care before and during the national COVID-19 lockdown in Nepal.

methodsIn this prospective observational study, we collected participant-level data for pregnant women enrolled in the SUSTAIN and REFINE studies between Jan 1 and May 30, 2020, from nine hospitals in Nepal. This period included 12·5 weeks before the national lockdown and 9·5 weeks during the lockdown. Women were eligible for inclusion if they had a gestational age of 22 weeks or more, a fetal heart sound at time of admission, and consented to inclusion. Women who had multiple births and their babies were excluded. We collected information on demographic and obstetric characteristics via extraction from case notes and health worker performance via direct observation by independent clinical researchers. We used regression analyses to assess changes in the number of institutional births, quality of care, and mortality before lockdown versus during lockdown.

findingsOf 22 907 eligible women, 21 763 women were enrolled and 20 354 gave birth, and health worker performance was recorded for 10 543 births. From the beginning to the end of the study period, the mean weekly number of births decreased from 1261·1 births (SE 66·1) before lockdown to 651·4 births (49·9) during lockdown-a reduction of 52·4%. The institutional stillbirth rate increased from 14 per 1000 total births before lockdown to 21 per 1000 total births during lockdown (p=0·0002), and institutional neonatal mortality increased from 13 per 1000 livebirths to 40 per 1000 livebirths (p=0·0022). In terms of quality of care, intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring decreased by 13·4% (-15·4 to -11·3; p<0·0001), and breastfeeding within 1 h of birth decreased by 3·5% (-4·6 to -2·6; p=0·0032). The immediate newborn care practice of placing the baby skin-to-skin with their mother increased by 13·2% (12·1 to 14·5; p<0·0001), and health workers' hand hygiene practices during childbirth increased by 12·9% (11·8 to 13·9) during lockdown (p<0·0001).

interpretationInstitutional childbirth reduced by more than half during lockdown, with increases in institutional stillbirth rate and neonatal mortality, and decreases in quality of care. Some behaviours improved, notably hand hygiene and keeping the baby skin-to-skin with their mother. An urgent need exists to protect access to high quality intrapartum care and prevent excess deaths for the most vulnerable health system users during this pandemic period.

fundingGrand Challenges Canada.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornNepalPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPregnancyProspective StudiesStillbirth

Identifiers

PMID32791117
PMCPMC7417164
OpenAlexW3047709812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.