Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32791034›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

Susceptibility to Hepatitis A and B Virus Among Clients at a Syringe Services Program in Philadelphia, 2018.

Mary Figgatt, Jack Hildick-Smith, Eman Addish, Jennie Coleman, José Benitez, Catherine Freeland, Steven Alles, Kendra Viner, Caroline Johnson, Danica Kuncio

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Determining Herd Immunity Thresholds for Hepatitis A Virus Transmission to Inform Vaccination Strategies Among People Who Inject Drugs in 16 US States.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Therapeutic advances in infectious disease
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mary Figgatt6542 Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3312-2413
Jack Hildick-Smith6542 Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Eman Addish6542 Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jennie ColemanPrevention Point Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
José BenitezPrevention Point Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Catherine Freeland206052 Hepatitis B Foundation, Doylestown, PA, USA.
Steven Alles6542 Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kendra Viner6542 Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Caroline Johnson6542 Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Danica Kuncio6542 Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Philadelphia Department of Public Health · USCenter Point · USHepatitis B Foundation · US

Funding

NYCDOHMH Evaluation of STD Programs Deploying DI Specialist to Improve HIV Outcomes Part BH25PS005109 · PS · NEW YORK CITY HEALTH/MENTAL HYGIENE · PI BORGES, CHRISTINE · 2015 to 2015
$155k
NCHHSTP CDC HHS H25 PS005109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAlthough many people who use drugs meet criteria for vaccination against hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV), estimates of susceptibility (ie, lack of immunity) are not well established. This study sought to identify the prevalence of and characteristics associated with HAV and HBV susceptibility among people who use drugs attending an urban syringe services program.

methodsWe initiated this seroprevalence study in 2018 among 438 clients of a syringe services program who met study criteria, including provision of a blood specimen and a self-reported history of drug use. We assessed HAV and HBV susceptibility and infection via serological testing. We examined associations between participant characteristics and serology status by using descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models.

resultsOf the initial 438 clients identified, 353 (80.6%) met study criteria. Of 352 participants with conclusive HAV test results, 48.6% (n = 171) were HAV susceptible; of 337 participants with conclusive HBV test results, 32.6% (n = 110) were HBV susceptible, 24.3% (n = 82) showed evidence of past or present HBV infection, and 43.0% (n = 145) had vaccine-derived immunity. Compared with participants born before 1970, participants born during 1980-1989 had 5.90 (95% CI, 2.42-14.40) times the odds of HAV susceptibility and 0.18 (95% CI, 0.06-0.53) times the odds of HBV susceptibility, and participants born during 1990-1999 had 6.31 (95% CI, 2.34-17.00) times the odds of HAV susceptibility. Decreased odds of HAV susceptibility were associated with homelessness (adjusted odds ratio = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.28-0.82).

conclusionDespite applicable HAV and HBV vaccination recommendations, substantial gaps exist in HAV and HBV susceptibility among a population of people who use drugs. These findings highlight the need for increased HAV and HBV vaccination efforts among people who use drugs.

Indexed as

Disease SusceptibilityAdultDrug UsersFemaleHepatitis AHepatitis BHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeedle-Exchange ProgramsPhiladelphiaRisk FactorsUrban PopulationYoung Adultdrug usehepatitis A virushepatitis B virussusceptibilitysyringe services programs

Identifiers

PMID32791034
PMCPMC7485047
OpenAlexW3048982936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.