Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32790868›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021

Efficient and effective control of confounding in eQTL mapping studies through joint differential expression and Mendelian randomization analyses.

Yue Fan, Huanhuan Zhu, Yanyi Song, Qinke Peng, Xiang Zhou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yue FanKey Laboratory of Trace Elements and Endemic Diseases of National Health and Family Planning Commission, School of Public Health, Health Science Center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China.
Huanhuan ZhuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Yanyi SongDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Qinke PengSystems Engineering Institute, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710049, China.
Xiang ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USXi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

Statistical Methods for Modeling Polygenic Architecture in Association and Re-sequencing StudiesR01HG009124 · NHGRI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Xiang Zhou · 2017 to 2026
$3.0M
New directions in single cell genomics method developmentR01GM126553 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Mengjie Chen · 2017 to 2026
$2.9M
Develop new bioinformatics infrastructures and computational tools for epitranscriptomics dataR01HG012927 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Mengjie Chen · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG009124NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG012927NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationIdentifying cis-acting genetic variants associated with gene expression levels-an analysis commonly referred to as expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) mapping-is an important first step toward understanding the genetic determinant of gene expression variation. Successful eQTL mapping requires effective control of confounding factors. A common method for confounding effects control in eQTL mapping studies is the probabilistic estimation of expression residual (PEER) analysis. PEER analysis extracts PEER factors to serve as surrogates for confounding factors, which is further included in the subsequent eQTL mapping analysis. However, it is computationally challenging to determine the optimal number of PEER factors used for eQTL mapping. In particular, the standard approach to determine the optimal number of PEER factors examines one number at a time and chooses a number that optimizes eQTLs discovery. Unfortunately, this standard approach involves multiple repetitive eQTL mapping procedures that are computationally expensive, restricting its use in large-scale eQTL mapping studies that being collected today.

resultsHere, we present a simple and computationally scalable alternative, Effect size Correlation for COnfounding determination (ECCO), to determine the optimal number of PEER factors used for eQTL mapping studies. Instead of performing repetitive eQTL mapping, ECCO jointly applies differential expression analysis and Mendelian randomization analysis, leading to substantial computational savings. In simulations and real data applications, we show that ECCO identifies a similar number of PEER factors required for eQTL mapping analysis as the standard approach but is two orders of magnitude faster. The computational scalability of ECCO allows for optimized eQTL discovery across 48 GTEx tissues for the first time, yielding an overall 5.89% power gain on the number of eQTL harboring genes (eGenes) discovered as compared to the previous GTEx recommendation that does not attempt to determine tissue-specific optimal number of PEER factors. AVAILABILITYAND IMPLEMENTATION: Our method is implemented in the ECCO software, which, along with its GTEx mapping results, is freely available at www.xzlab.org/software.html. All R scripts used in this study are also available at this site. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Mendelian Randomization AnalysisQuantitative Trait LociGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingGenome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSoftware

Identifiers

PMID32790868
PMCPMC8058772
OpenAlexW3049224831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.