Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32790861›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2020

Nesprins are mechanotransducers that discriminate epithelial-mesenchymal transition programs.

Théophile Déjardin, Pietro Salvatore Carollo, François Sipieter, Patricia M Davidson, Cynthia Seiler, Damien Cuvelier, Bruno Cadot, Cecile Sykes, Edgar R Gomes, Nicolas Borghi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Force-dependent structural dynamics of the giant nesprin-2.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Emerin deficiency drives MCF7 cells to an invasive phenotype.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Théophile DéjardinUniversité de Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Jacques Monod, Paris, France.
Pietro Salvatore CarolloUniversité de Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Jacques Monod, Paris, France.
François SipieterUniversité de Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Jacques Monod, Paris, France.
Patricia M DavidsonLaboratoire Physico-Chimie Curie, Institut Curie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche 168, Sorbonne Universités, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, Paris, France.
Cynthia SeilerUniversité de Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Jacques Monod, Paris, France.
Damien CuvelierInstitut Curie and Institut Pierre Gilles de Gennes, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Rercherche 144, Paris, France.
Bruno CadotCenter for Research in Myology, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité Mixte de Recherche 974, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France.
Cecile SykesLaboratoire Physico-Chimie Curie, Institut Curie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche 168, Sorbonne Universités, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, Paris, France.
Edgar R GomesCenter for Research in Myology, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité Mixte de Recherche 974, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France.
Nicolas BorghiUniversité de Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Jacques Monod, Paris, France.
Université Paris Cité · FRSorbonne Université · FRInserm · FRInstitut Pierre-Gilles de Gennes pour la Microfluidique · FRUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

European Research Council 617676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

LINC complexes are transmembrane protein assemblies that physically connect the nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton through the nuclear envelope. Dysfunctions of LINC complexes are associated with pathologies such as cancer and muscular disorders. The mechanical roles of LINC complexes are poorly understood. To address this, we used genetically encoded FRET biosensors of molecular tension in a nesprin protein of the LINC complex of fibroblastic and epithelial cells in culture. We exposed cells to mechanical, genetic, and pharmacological perturbations, mimicking a range of physiological and pathological situations. We show that nesprin experiences tension generated by the cytoskeleton and acts as a mechanical sensor of cell packing. Moreover, nesprin discriminates between inductions of partial and complete epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. We identify the implicated mechanisms, which involve α-catenin capture at the nuclear envelope by nesprin upon its relaxation, thereby regulating β-catenin transcription. Our data thus implicate LINC complex proteins as mechanotransducers that fine-tune β-catenin signaling in a manner dependent on the epithelial-mesenchymal transition program.

Indexed as

Animalsbeta CateninBiosensing TechniquesDogsEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferHumansMadin Darby Canine Kidney CellsMechanotransduction, CellularMiceMicrotubulesMultiprotein ComplexesNerve Tissue ProteinsNIH 3T3 CellsNuclear EnvelopeNuclear Matrixbeta CateninCTNNB1 protein, mouseMultiprotein ComplexesNerve Tissue ProteinsNuclear ProteinsSyne2 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID32790861
PMCPMC7659719
OpenAlexW3049028529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.