Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32790727›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Excreta biomarkers in response to different gut barrier dysfunction models and probiotic supplementation in broiler chickens.

Reza Barekatain, Gordon S Howarth, Nicky-Lee Willson, David Cadogan, Stuart Wilkinson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A NEW FOCUS ON FIBER.Poultry science · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Association ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Identifying the shortfalls of crude protein-reduced, wheat-based broiler diets.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Reza BarekatainSouth Australian Research and Development Institute, Roseworthy, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7184-0881
Gordon S HowarthSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA, Australia.
Nicky-Lee WillsonSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA, Australia.
David CadoganFeedworks Pty Ltd, Romsey, VIC, Australia.
Stuart WilkinsonFeedworks Pty Ltd, Romsey, VIC, Australia.
The University of Adelaide · AUSouth Australian Research and Development Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased intestinal permeability (IP) and inflammation are both linked with functionality of the intestinal barrier and in particular enterocytes. Currently, almost all assessment methods of the intestinal barrier function are invasive. The present study aimed to quantify selected proteins as novel biomarkers in excreta of broiler chickens to facilitate non-invasive assessment of gut barrier function using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). It was further hypothesised that probiotics as feed additives may counteract gut barrier dysfunction. A 3 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments was used with the main factors being gut barrier dysfunction models (control, rye-based diet, and dexamethasone-DEX) with and without probiotic supplementation (a three-strain Bacillus) using 72 male Ross 308 day-old chickens. Each of the 6 experimental treatments was replicated 12 times. On d 21 of age, fluorescein isothiocyanate dextran (FITC-d) uptake into serum was examined to test IP. Fresh excreta samples were collected on d 20. The biomarkers included alpha-1 antitrypsin (A1AT), intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP), lipocalin-2 (LCN2), fibronectin (FN), intestinal alkaline phosphatase (IAP), ovotransferrin (OVT) and superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn] (SOD1). Only DEX increased (P<0.001) FITC-d passage to the blood on d 21 of age, indicating a greater IP. The excreta concentrations of A1AT, I-FABP and SOD1 were unaltered by the experimental treatments. DEX increased (P<0.05) FN concentration in excreta compared with control birds. Conversely, inclusion of rye in the diet reduced (P<0.05) FN but increased (P<0.001) OVT in excreta. Independently, DEX decreased IAP (P<0.05) in excreta compared with control and rye-fed birds. The excreta concentration of LCN2 tended (P = 0.086) to increase in birds injected by DEX. There was no demonstrable effect of probiotic addition on any of the studied parameters. Among the tested biomarkers, FN, IAP, and LCN2 revealed promise as biomarkers of intestinal barrier function quantified by ELISA kits.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimalsBiomarkersCell Membrane PermeabilityChickensDietDietary SupplementsFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeIntestinesMaleProbioticsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID32790727
PMCPMC7425878
OpenAlexW3049240529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.