Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32790715›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Glecaprevir-pibrentasvir for chronic hepatitis C: Comparing treatment effect in patients with and without end-stage renal disease in a real-world setting.

Hsu-Heng Yen, Pei-Yuan Su, Ya-Huei Zeng, I-Ling Liu, Siou-Ping Huang, Yu-Chun Hsu, Yang-Yuan Chen, Chia-Wei Yang, Shun-Sheng Wu, Kun-Ching Chou

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. [Sustained virologic response in patients with hepatitis C and chronic kidney disease].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hsu-Heng YenDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3494-2245
Pei-Yuan SuDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Ya-Huei ZengDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
I-Ling LiuDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Siou-Ping HuangDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Yu-Chun HsuDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Yang-Yuan ChenDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Chia-Wei YangDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Shun-Sheng WuDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Kun-Ching ChouDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Changhua Christian Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is increasingly observed in patients with renal disease. With the introduction of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) as a pan-genotype therapy for HCV, treatment efficacy is expected to rise. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of GLE/PIB treatment in adults with HCV infection and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The primary end point was sustained virological response (SVR) observed 12 weeks after completed treatment.

resultsWe enrolled 235 patients, including 44 patients with ESRD. Median age was 60 years, and 48% were males. Twenty-two percent had cirrhosis. HCV genotypes 1 (43%) and 2 (41%) were the most common. The overall SVR rate was 96.6%. Patients with ESRD were older than those without (67.6 years vs 58.3 years, p < 0.001) and trended toward having a higher prevalence of cirrhosis (32% vs 19%, p = 0.071). A significant proportion of patients with ESRD complained of skin itching during treatment (61% vs 26%, p < 0.001), and the SVR rate were similar between these two groups (95.45% vs 96.86%, p = 0.644).

conclusionsDespite a higher rate of pruritus among patients with ESRD, GLE/PIB-based therapy achieved similarly high SVR rates among patients with and without ESRD.

Indexed as

Sustained Virologic ResponseAminoisobutyric AcidsAntiviral AgentsBenzimidazolesCyclopropanesFemaleHepacivirusHepatitis C, ChronicHumansKidney Failure, ChronicLactams, MacrocyclicLeucineMaleMiddle AgedProlinePyrrolidinesAminoisobutyric AcidsAntiviral AgentsBenzimidazolesCyclopropanesglecaprevirLactams, MacrocyclicLeucinepibrentasvirProlinePyrrolidinesQuinoxalinesSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID32790715
PMCPMC7425913
OpenAlexW3049534734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.