ArticlePloS one2020
A rapid and cost-effective pipeline for digitization of museum specimens with 3D photogrammetry.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Methodological Case Study for Integrating Virtual Reality and 3D Photogrammetry: A Pilot Digital Platform for Exploring Mangrove Environments.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Open access and digital morphology data in evolutionary biology: expanding frontiers of knowledge.BMC ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- Article
- Repeated climate-driven dispersal and speciation in peripheral populations of Pleistocene mastodons.Science advances · 2025Article
- Combined Structural and Functional 3D Plant Imaging Using Structure from Motion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- AutoScan3D: A low-cost, portable photogrammetry system for automated 3D digitization of anatomical specimens.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Applying 3D Models of Giant Salamanders to Explore Form-Function Relationships in Early Digit-Bearing Tetrapods.Integrative and comparative biology · 2024Article
- Increasing the impact of vertebrate scientific collections through 3D imaging: The openVertebrate (oVert) Thematic Collections Network.Bioscience · 2024Review
- Assessment of Apple's object capture photogrammetry API for rapidly creating research quality cultural heritage 3D models.PloS one · 2024Article
- Recording animal-view videos of the natural world using a novel camera system and software package.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Opportunities and Challenges in Applying AI to Evolutionary Morphology.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2024Review
- A workflow for the creation of photorealistic 3D cadaveric models using photogrammetry.Journal of anatomy · 2023Article
- Temporal stability of the hybrid zone betweenEcology and evolution · 2023Article
- New Method for Rapid 3D Reconstruction of Semi-Transparent Underwater Animals and Structures.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- A high-throughput multispectral imaging system for museum specimens.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Review
- Photogrammetric reconstruction of 3D carpological collection in high resolution for plants authentication and species discovery.PloS one · 2022Article
- Phototank setup and focus stack imaging method for reptile and amphibian specimens (Amphibia, Reptilia).ZooKeys · 2022Article
- Web databases of feather photographs are useful tools for avian morphometry studies.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural history collections are yielding more information as digitization brings specimen data to researchers, connects specimens across museums, and as new technologies allow for more large-scale data collection. Therefore, a key goal in specimen digitization is developing methods that both increase access and allow for the highest yield of phenomic data. 3D digitization is increasingly popular because it has the potential to meet both aspects of that key goal. However, current methods overlook or do not prioritize some of the most sought-after phenotypic traits, those involving the external appearance of specimens, especially color. Here, we introduce an efficient and cost-effective pipeline for 3D photogrammetry to capture the external appearance of natural history specimens and other museum objects. 3D photogrammetry aligns and compares sets of dozens, hundreds, or even thousands of photos to create 3D models. The hardware set-up requires little physical space and around $3,000 in initial investment, while the software pipeline requires $1,400/year for proprietary software subscriptions (with open-source alternatives). The creation of each 3D model takes 1-2 hours/specimen and much of the software pipeline is automated with minimal supervision required, including the onerous step of mesh processing. We showcase the method by creating 3D models for most of the type specimens in the Moore Laboratory of Zoology bird collection and show that digital bill measurements are comparable to hand-taken measurements. Color data, while not included as part of this pipeline, is easily extractable from the models and one of the most promising areas of data collection. Future advances can adapt the method for ultraviolet reflectance capture and increased efficiency and model quality. Combined with genomic data, phenomic data from 3D models including photogrammetry will open new doors to understanding organismal evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.