Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32790667›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Mobile phones: The effect of its presence on learning and memory.

Clarissa Theodora Tanil, Min Hooi Yong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Children, Cell Phones, and Reading Comprehension.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. "Phone in the Room, Mind on the Roam": Investigating the Impact of Mobile Phone Presence on Distraction.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Does the Brain Drain Effect Really Exist? A Meta-Analysis.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Clarissa Theodora TanilDepartment of Psychology, Sunway University, Selangor, Malaysia.
Min Hooi YongDepartment of Psychology, Sunway University, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-4669-7013
Sunway University · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our aim was to examine the effect of a smartphone's presence on learning and memory among undergraduates. A total of 119 undergraduates completed a memory task and the Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS). As predicted, those without smartphones had higher recall accuracy compared to those with smartphones. Results showed a significant negative relationship between phone conscious thought, "how often did you think about your phone", and memory recall but not for SAS and memory recall. Phone conscious thought significantly predicted memory accuracy. We found that the presence of a smartphone and high phone conscious thought affects one's memory learning and recall, indicating the negative effect of a smartphone proximity to our learning and memory.

Indexed as

AttentionCell PhoneCognitionDependency, PsychologicalFemaleHumansLearningMaleMemoryMemory, Short-TermSmartphoneStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32790667
PMCPMC7425970
OpenAlexW3049723110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.