Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32790103›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2020

Clinical response to 2 protocols of aerosolized gentamicin in 46 dogs with Bordetella bronchiseptica infection (2012-2018).

Aude Morgane Canonne, Elodie Roels, Maud Menard, Loïc Desquilbet, Frédéric Billen, Cécile Clercx

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biofilm Formation and the Pore ProteinsAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aude Morgane CanonneDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9263-1744
Elodie RoelsDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Maud MenardSmall Animals Internal Medicine Unit, National Veterinary School of Alfort, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Loïc DesquilbetUnit of Biostatistics, National Veterinary School of Alfort, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Frédéric BillenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Cécile ClercxDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
University of Liège · BEÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBordetella bronchiseptica (Bb) infection commonly causes respiratory disease in dogs. Gentamicin delivered by aerosol maximizes local drug delivery without systemic absorption but clinical response to protocols remains undetermined.

objectivesTo compare the clinical response to 2 protocols of aerosolized delivery of gentamicin in bordetellosis. ANIMALS: Forty-six dogs with Bb infection confirmed by culture or quantitative polymerase chain reaction on bronchoalveolar lavage.

methodsRetrospective study. Administration of aerosolized gentamicin for ≥10 minutes q12h for ≥3 weeks using 4 mg/kg diluted with saline (group 1) or undiluted 5% solution (group 2). Clinical response firstly assessed after 3-4 weeks and treatment pursued by 3-weeks increments if cure not reached. Cure defined as absence of cough persisting at least a week after treatment interruption.

resultsDemographic data were similar between both groups. Clinical cure at 3-4 weeks was more frequently observed with the use of undiluted solution (19/33 vs 3/13 dogs, P = .03) in association with a shorter median duration of treatment (4 vs 6 weeks, P = .01). Dogs from group 2 having less than 1000 cells/μL in lavage were also more likely to be cured at 3-4 weeks than dogs with more than 1000 cells/μL [9/9 vs 10/19, P = .006] and median duration of treatment in that subgroup of animals was reduced (3 vs 5 weeks, P = .02). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Aerosolized delivery of gentamicin seems effective for inducing clinical cure in Bb infection. Clinical response appears better using undiluted 5% solution, particularly in the subgroup of dogs having less than 1000 cells/μL in lavage.

Indexed as

Bordetella bronchisepticaBordetella InfectionsDog DiseasesAnimalsDogsGentamicinsRetrospective StudiesGentamicinsaerosolBordetella bronchisepticabronchoalveolar lavagecanine infectious respiratory disease (CIRD)doggentamicinnebulization

Identifiers

PMID32790103
PMCPMC7517846
OpenAlexW3048764754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.