Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32789884›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2020

A comparison of food-based decision-making between restricting and binge-eating/purging subtypes of anorexia nervosa.

Blair Uniacke, Reile Slattery, B Timothy Walsh, Daphna Shohamy, Karin Foerde, Joanna Steinglass

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Neural Representations of Food-Related Attributes in the Human Orbitofrontal Cortex during Choice Deliberation in Anorexia Nervosa.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Blair UniackeDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8858-3575
Reile SlatteryDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
B Timothy WalshDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Daphna ShohamyDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Karin FoerdeDepartment of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5804-9312
Joanna SteinglassDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8434-8212
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USAllen Institute for Brain Science · USCornell University · USNew York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · US

Funding

Research Training in Biobehavioral Disturbances of Eating DisordersT32MH096679 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI EVELYN ATTIA, B. TIMOTHY WALSH · 2013 to 2026
$2.4M
Neural Mechanisms of Food Choice in Anorexia NervosaR01MH105452 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI SHOHAMY, DAPHNA, STEINGLASS, JOANNA E · 2015 to 2018
$2.3M
Training and Mentoring in Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Eating DisordersK24MH113737 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI STEINGLASS, JOANNA E · 2018 to 2022
$614k
Food Avoidance in Anorexia Nervosa-A Test of Generalization MechanismsR21MH126246 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI STEINGLASS, JOANNA E · 2022 to 2023
$440k
NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH113737NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105452NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH126246NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH096679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBy definition, restricting (ANR) and binge-eating/purging (ANBP) subtypes of anorexia nervosa (AN) differ in some manifestations of maladaptive eating behavior. This study aimed to determine whether the groups differ in the choices they make about what to eat, and whether there are differences in valuation related to food choice, using an experimental paradigm.

methodInpatients with ANR (n = 40) and ANBP (n = 46) participated in a Food Choice Task. During the task, participants rated 76 food images for healthiness and tastiness, and choice preferences. Groups were compared in percent selection of high-fat and low-fat foods, value ratings of foods, and engagement of self-control in food choice.

resultsThere were no differences between AN subtypes in healthiness or tastiness ratings, or in tendency to limit choice of high-fat foods. There was no difference between the groups in measures of self-control in food choice. DISCUSSION: Individuals with ANR and ANBP similarly manifest reduced choices of high-fat foods, with similar tendencies to undervalue the tastiness of high-fat foods. These results suggest that while individuals with ANR and ANBP differ across a range of clinical characteristics, the decision-making process associated with the maladaptive restriction of high-fat foods characteristic of AN is shared by both subtypes.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnorexia NervosaBinge-Eating DisorderDecision MakingFemaleFood PreferencesHumansSelf-ControlYoung Adultanorexia nervosachoicedecision-makingeating behavioreating disorderssubtype

Identifiers

PMID32789884
PMCPMC8432595
OpenAlexW3049177040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.