Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32789813›Full record

ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2020

Review of available national guidelines for obstetric anal sphincter injury.

Joanna C Roper, Nirmala Amber, Osanna Yee Ki Wan, Abdul H Sultan, Ranee Thakar

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Episiotomy: Are Indian Obstetricians Getting the Angle Right?Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Under-classified obstetric anal sphincter injuries.International urogynecology journal · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Joanna C RoperObstetrics and Gynaecology department, Croydon University Hospital, London Road, Croydon, CR7 7YE, UK.
Nirmala AmberKIMS Hospitals, Secunderabad, India.
Osanna Yee Ki WanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong.
Abdul H SultanObstetrics and Gynaecology department, Croydon University Hospital, London Road, Croydon, CR7 7YE, UK.
Ranee ThakarObstetrics and Gynaecology department, Croydon University Hospital, London Road, Croydon, CR7 7YE, UK. ranee.thakar@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5279-141X
St George's, University of London · GBChinese University of Hong Kong · HKCroydon University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisObstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) are the most severe form of perineal trauma with potentially devastating effects on a mother's quality of life. There are various national guidelines available for their management. The aim of this study was to review and compare recommendations from published national guidelines regarding management and prevention of OASI.

methodsWe searched the PUBMED, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL and COCHRANE databases from January 2008 till October 2019 using relevant Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), including all subheadings. The guideline characteristics were mapped and methodological quality assessed with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool by three independent reviewers. To compare the methodological quality of the guidelines, the interpretation of the six domain scores were taken into consideration. By consensus of the authors, a score of 70% was taken as a cut-off, and scores above this were considered 'high quality'.

resultsThirteen national guidelines on perineal trauma were included and analysed. Nine of these were specific to OASI. There is wide variation in methodological quality and evidence used for recommendations. AGREE scores for overall guideline assessment were > 70% in eight of the guidelines, with Australia-Queensland, Canada, the UK and USA scoring highest.

conclusionsThe wide variation in methodological quality and evidence used for recommendations suggests that there is a need for an agreed international guideline. This will enable healthcare practitioners to follow the same recommendations, with the most recent evidence, and provide evidence-based care to all women globally.

Indexed as

Anal CanalQuality of LifeAustraliaCanadaDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansPregnancyQueenslandAGREE IIGuidelines.Obstetric anal sphincter injuryRecommendations

Identifiers

PMID32789813
PMCPMC7561538
OpenAlexW3049361162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.