ArticleGenetica2020
Rejection of the beneficial acclimation hypothesis (BAH) for short term heat acclimation in Drosophila nepalensis.
Article in Genetica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-nucleus multiome ATAC and RNA sequencing reveals the molecular basis of thermal acclimation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Developmental plasticity does not improve performance during a species interaction: Implications for species turnover.Ecology · 2025Article
- Context-dependent integrated stress resistance promotes a global invasive pest.Insect science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Beneficial acclimation hypothesis (BAH) is the phenotypic plasticity in response to changing environments which enables organisms to enhance their fitness. In recent years, however, BAH has received vigorous criticism and is still debatable. In this study, we tested thermal hardiness phenotypes (melanization, chill coma recovery, heat knockdown and percentage survival) on adult and pre-adult stages of Drosophila nepalensis, reared in different thermal environments (14, 17, 21 and 25 °C) to check whether increasing natural surrounding temperature and acclimation limit towards environmental change is detrimental or beneficial. Results showed that rearing D. nepalensis at higher temperatures (21 and 25 °C) reduces its melanization and cold hardiness but improves heat knockdown times. When temperature was raised to 26.2 °C (0.6 °C above the upper thermal maxima), to determine the short-term acclimation effects, survival and fitness of adults diminished approximately 1.5 to 2 folds. These results suggest that D. nepalensis has long-term developmental acclimation to both heat and cold which would be extremely beneficial as temperatures and climates alter in the region due to global warming. However, a lack of short-term heat acclimation suggests that rapid shifts in thermal extreme could be detrimental to D. nepalensis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.