Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32789784›Full record

ArticleGenetica2020

Rejection of the beneficial acclimation hypothesis (BAH) for short term heat acclimation in Drosophila nepalensis.

Seema Ramniwas, Girish Kumar, Divya Singh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Seema RamniwasUniversity Center for Research and Development, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali, 140413, India. seema.ramniwas@gmail.com.
Girish KumarGenomics and Bioinformatics Cluster, Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, 4110 Libra Drive, Orlando, FL, 32816, USA.
Divya SinghUniversity Center for Research and Development, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali, 140413, India. singh.genetics@gmail.com.
Chandigarh University · INUniversity of Central Florida · US

Funding

Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi SP/YO/775/2018G
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beneficial acclimation hypothesis (BAH) is the phenotypic plasticity in response to changing environments which enables organisms to enhance their fitness. In recent years, however, BAH has received vigorous criticism and is still debatable. In this study, we tested thermal hardiness phenotypes (melanization, chill coma recovery, heat knockdown and percentage survival) on adult and pre-adult stages of Drosophila nepalensis, reared in different thermal environments (14, 17, 21 and 25 °C) to check whether increasing natural surrounding temperature and acclimation limit towards environmental change is detrimental or beneficial. Results showed that rearing D. nepalensis at higher temperatures (21 and 25 °C) reduces its melanization and cold hardiness but improves heat knockdown times. When temperature was raised to 26.2 °C (0.6 °C above the upper thermal maxima), to determine the short-term acclimation effects, survival and fitness of adults diminished approximately 1.5 to 2 folds. These results suggest that D. nepalensis has long-term developmental acclimation to both heat and cold which would be extremely beneficial as temperatures and climates alter in the region due to global warming. However, a lack of short-term heat acclimation suggests that rapid shifts in thermal extreme could be detrimental to D. nepalensis.

Indexed as

ThermotoleranceAnimalsDrosophilaLife Cycle StagesPhenotypeBeneficial acclimation hypothesisClimate changeDrosophila nepalensisFitnessHimalayasStress resistance

Identifiers

PMID32789784
OpenAlexW3049413590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.