Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32789761›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2020

Non-dispensing pharmacist integrated in the primary care team: effect on the quality of physician's prescribing, a non-randomised comparative study.

Vivianne M Sloeserwij, Dorien L M Zwart, Ankie C M Hazen, Judith M Poldervaart, Anne J Leendertse, Antoinette A de Bont, Marcel L Bouvy, Niek J de Wit, Han J de Gier

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vivianne M SloeserwijDepartment of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands. v.sloeserwij@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3521-8109
Dorien L M ZwartDepartment of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ankie C M HazenDepartment of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Judith M PoldervaartDepartment of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Anne J LeendertseDepartment of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Antoinette A de BontErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcel L BouvyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Niek J de WitDepartment of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Han J de GierDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, Building 3214, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

Achmea Z456ZonMw 80-833600-98-10206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Especially in elderly with polypharmacy, medication can do harm. Clinical pharmacists integrated in primary care teams might improve quality of pharmaceutical care. Objective To assess the effect of non-dispensing clinical pharmacists integrated in primary care teams on general practitioners' prescribing quality. Setting This study was conducted in 25 primary care practices in the Netherlands. Methods Non-randomised, controlled, multi-centre, complex intervention study with pre-post comparison. First, we identified potential prescribing quality indicators from the literature and assessed their feasibility, validity, acceptability, reliability and sensitivity to change. Also, an expert panel assessed the indicators' health impact. Next, using the final set of indicators, we measured the quality of prescribing in practices where non-dispensing pharmacists were integrated in the team (intervention group) compared to usual care (two control groups). Data were extracted anonymously from the healthcare records. Comparisons were made using mixed models correcting for potential confounders. Main outcome measure Quality of prescribing, measured with prescribing quality indicators. Results Of 388 eligible indicators reported in the literature we selected 8. In addition, two more indicators relevant for Dutch general practice were formulated by an expert panel. Scores on all 10 indicators improved in the intervention group after introduction of the non-dispensing pharmacist. However, when compared to control groups, prescribing quality improved solely on the indicator measuring monitoring of the renal function in patients using antihypertensive medication: relative risk of a monitored renal function in the intervention group compared to usual care: 1.03 (95% CI 1.01-1.05, p-value 0.010) and compared to usual care plus: 1.04 (1.01-1.06, p-value 0.004). Conclusion This study did not demonstrate a consistent effect of the introduction of non-dispensing clinical pharmacists in the primary care team on the quality of physician's prescribing.This study is part of the POINT-study, which was registered at The Netherlands National Trial Register with trial registration number NTR-4389.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Care TeamPharmaceutical ServicesPharmacistsPolypharmacyPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareProfessional RoleNon-dispensing pharmacistPharmaceutical carePrescribingProcess indicatorQuality

Identifiers

PMID32789761
PMCPMC7522101
OpenAlexW3049739477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.