Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32789678›Full record

Trial reportClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2021

Multi-proteomic approach to predict specific cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes and myocardial infarction: findings from the EXAMINE trial.

João Pedro Ferreira, Abhinav Sharma, Cyrus Mehta, George Bakris, Patrick Rossignol, William B White, Faiez Zannad

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

João Pedro FerreiraUniversité de Lorraine, Centre D'Investigation Clinique- Plurithématique Inserm CIC-P 1433, Inserm U1116, CHRU Nancy Hopitaux de Brabois, F-CRIN INI-CRCT (Cardiovascular and Renal Clinical Trialists), Nancy, France. j.ferreira@chru-nancy.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2304-6138
Abhinav SharmaDivision of Cardiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Cyrus MehtaCytel Corporation, Cambridge, MA, USA.
George BakrisDepartment of Medicine, American Heart Association Comprehensive Hypertension Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Patrick RossignolUniversité de Lorraine, Centre D'Investigation Clinique- Plurithématique Inserm CIC-P 1433, Inserm U1116, CHRU Nancy Hopitaux de Brabois, F-CRIN INI-CRCT (Cardiovascular and Renal Clinical Trialists), Nancy, France.
William B WhiteCalhoun Cardiology Center, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Faiez ZannadUniversité de Lorraine, Centre D'Investigation Clinique- Plurithématique Inserm CIC-P 1433, Inserm U1116, CHRU Nancy Hopitaux de Brabois, F-CRIN INI-CRCT (Cardiovascular and Renal Clinical Trialists), Nancy, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with diabetes who had a recent myocardial infarction (MI) are at high risk of cardiovascular events. Therefore, risk assessment is important for treatment and shared decisions. We used data from EXAMINE trial to investigate whether a multi-proteomic approach would provide specific proteomic signatures and also improve the prognostic capacity for determining the risk of cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, heart failure [HF], all-cause death, and combinations of these outcomes.

methods93 circulating proteins (92 from the Olink® CVDII plus troponin) were assessed in 5131 patients. Cox, competing risks, and reclassification measures were applied.

resultsThe clinical model showed good discrimination and calibration for all outcomes. On top of the clinical model that included age, sex, smoking, diabetes duration, history of MI (prior to the index MI of inclusion), history of HF hospitalization, history of stroke, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, systolic blood pressure, statin therapy, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and study treatment (alogliptin or placebo), troponin and BNP added prognostic information to the composite of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke (∆C-index + 5%) and cardiovascular death alone (∆C-index + 7%). Troponin, BNP, and TRAILR2 added prognostic information on all-cause death and the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. HF hospitalization alone was improved by adding BNP and Gal-9. For MI, troponin, FGF23, and AMBP added prognostic value; whereas for stroke, only troponin added prognostic value (multi-proteomics improved C-index > 3% [p < 0.001] for all the studied outcomes). The addition of the final biomarker selection to the clinical model improved event reclassification (cNRI from + 23% to + 64%). Specifically, the addition of the biomarkers allowed a better classification of patients at low risk (as having "true" low risk) and patients and high risk (as having "true" high risk). These results were consistent for all the studied outcomes with even more marked differences in the fatal events.

conclusionsThe addition of multi-proteomic biomarkers to a clinical model in this population with diabetes and a recent MI allowed a better risk prediction and event reclassification, potentially helping for better risk assessment and targeted treatment decisions. T2D type 2 diabetes, MI myocardial infarction, CV cardiovascular, HFH heart failure hospitalization, Δ delta, cNRI continuous net reclassification index, BNP brain natriuretic peptide, TRAILR2 trail receptor 2 (or death receptor 5), Gal-9 galectin-9, FGF23 fibroblast growth factor 23.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCause of DeathComorbidityDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleFibroblast Growth Factor-23HumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPiperidinesPrognosisProteomicsRisk AssessmentalogliptinBiomarkersFGF23 protein, humanFibroblast Growth Factor-23Hypoglycemic AgentsNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPiperidinesUracilCardiovascular eventsDiabetesProteomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.