Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32789650›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021

Retro-mode scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in evaluation of peripheral retinal lesions.

Dmitrii S Maltsev, Alexei N Kulikov, Maria A Burnasheva, Jay Chhablani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Spotlight on Lattice Degeneration Imaging Techniques.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dmitrii S MaltsevDepartment of Ophthalmology, Military Medical Academy, 21/1, Botkinskaya St, 194044, St Petersburg, Russia. glaz.med@yandex.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6598-3982
Alexei N KulikovDepartment of Ophthalmology, Military Medical Academy, 21/1, Botkinskaya St, 194044, St Petersburg, Russia.
Maria A BurnashevaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Military Medical Academy, 21/1, Botkinskaya St, 194044, St Petersburg, Russia.
Jay ChhablaniUniversity of Pittsburgh, UPMC Eye Center, 203 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
S. M. Kirov Military Medical Academy · RUUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo study the diagnostic potential of retro-mode scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (RM-SLO) for evaluation of peripheral retinal lesions.

methodsBased on the results of indirect ophthalmoscopy, in this study, we included asymptomatic subjects with lattice retinal degeneration, retinal break, or subclinical retinal detachment and subjects without any peripheral retinal lesions. All participants' fundus periphery was examined with RM-SLO over 360° for the presence of peripheral retinal lesions in a masked fashion. Detection rate for retinal breaks and detachments were compared between indirect ophthalmoscopy and RM-SLO.

resultsTwenty-six subjects (52 eyes, 15 males and 11 females, 34.8 ± 11.8 years) were included in the peripheral retinal lesion group and 25 individuals (50 eyes, 10 males and 15 females, 42.8 ± 14.5 years) were included in the group without peripheral retinal lesions. Among the patients with peripheral retinal lesions detected with indirect ophthalmoscopy in at least one eye, RM-SLO categorized 20.7% (p = 0.031) more eyes as having subclinical asymptomatic retinal detachment or at least one retinal break. Additionally, RM-SLO demonstrated 55.0% (p = 0.001) more subclinical retinal detachments and 31.5% (p = 0.002) more asymptomatic retinal breaks.

conclusionsRM-SLO showed high potential in diagnosing peripheral retinal lesions and may be a useful additional diagnostic tool for the patients who demonstrate peripheral retinal lesions with indirect ophthalmoscopy.

Indexed as

Retinal DetachmentRetinal PerforationsFemaleFundus OculiHumansLasersMaleOphthalmoscopyPeripheral retinal degenerationRetinal breakRetro-modeRhegmatogenous retinal detachmentScanning laser ophthalmoscopy

Identifiers

PMID32789650
OpenAlexW3048377991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.