Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32789592›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2020

Accuracy of breast MRI in patients receiving neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: comprehensive imaging analysis and correlation with clinical and pathological assessments.

Joana Reis, Jonas Christoffer Lindstrøm, Joao Boavida, Kjell-Inge Gjesdal, Daehoon Park, Nazli Bahrami, Manouchehr Seyedzadeh, Woldegabriel A Melles, Torill Sauer, Jürgen Geisler and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joana ReisDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Intervention, Akershus University Hospital (AHUS), Postboks 1000, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway. joana.reis@ahus.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0515-2022
Jonas Christoffer LindstrømInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Campus AHUS, University of Oslo, Postboks 1000, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway.
Joao BoavidaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Intervention, Akershus University Hospital (AHUS), Postboks 1000, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway.
Kjell-Inge GjesdalDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Intervention, Akershus University Hospital (AHUS), Postboks 1000, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway.
Daehoon ParkDepartment of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital (OUS), Postboks 4956, 0424, Nydalen, Norway.
Nazli BahramiDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Akershus University Hospital (AHUS), Postboks 1000, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway.
Manouchehr SeyedzadehDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Intervention, Akershus University Hospital (AHUS), Postboks 1000, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway.
Woldegabriel A MellesDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Intervention, Akershus University Hospital (AHUS), Postboks 1000, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway.
Torill SauerInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Campus AHUS, University of Oslo, Postboks 1000, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway.
Jürgen GeislerInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Campus AHUS, University of Oslo, Postboks 1000, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway.
Jonn Terje GeitungDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Intervention, Akershus University Hospital (AHUS), Postboks 1000, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway.
Akershus University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NOOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements in locally advanced oestrogen receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast tumours before, during and after neoadjuvant endocrine treatment (NET) for evaluation of tumour response in comparison with clinical and pathological assessments.

methodsThis prospective study enrolled postmenopausal patients treated neoadjuvant with letrozole and exemestane given sequentially in an intra-patient cross-over regimen. Fifty-four patients were initially recruited, but only 35 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and confirmed to participate with a median age of 77. Tumours were scanned with MRI prior to treatment, during the eighth week of treatment and prior to surgery. Additionally, changes in longest diameter on clinical examination (CE) and tumour size at pathology were determined. Pre- and post-operative measurements of tumour size were compared in order to evaluate tumour response.

resultsThe correlation between post-treatment MRI size and pathology was moderate and higher with a correlation coefficient (r) 0.64 compared to the correlation between CE and pathology r = 0.25. Post-treatment MRI and clinical results had a negligible bias towards underestimation of lesion size. Tumour size on MRI and CE had 0.82 cm and 0.52 cm lower mean size than tumour size measured by pathology, respectively.

conclusionsThe higher correlation between measurements of residual disease obtained on MRI and those obtained with pathology validates the accuracy of imaging assessment during NET. MRI was found to be more accurate for estimating complete responses than clinical assessments and warrants further investigation in larger cohorts to validate this finding.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyBreastFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingProspective StudiesBreast cancerMagnetic resonanceNeoadjuvant therapyTumour response

Identifiers

PMID32789592
PMCPMC7599143
OpenAlexW3048744976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.