Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32789586›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2020

Seasonal variation, temperature, day length, and IVF outcomes from fresh cycles.

Leslie V Farland, Katharine F B Correia, Stacey A Missmer, Catherine Racowsky

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects of different seasons on the outcome ofFrontiers in reproductive health · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Seasonal fluctuation of in vitro fertilization encounters in the United States.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Leslie V FarlandDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin Ave, PO Box 245211, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA. lfarland@arizona.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7455-8531
Katharine F B CorreiaDepartment of Mathematics & Statistics, Amherst College, Amherst, MA, USA.
Stacey A MissmerDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Catherine RacowskyDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Amherst College · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USGrand Rapids Community College · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIt is known that delivery rates from spontaneous conception vary according to season which may be due to cultural or environmental factors; however, conflicting data exist regarding whether outcomes from IVF are also seasonally dependent. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that the season at oocyte retrieval is associated with livebirth after fresh transfer.

methodsDates of oocyte retrieval for all autologous cycles in our IVF program between January 2012 and December 2017 were categorized by season. Dates were linked to local temperature (min, max, average) and day length obtained from meteorological records. Average maximum temperature and day length were categorized into tertiles. Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for age and quadratic age, were used to model odds (aOR) of implantation, clinical pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, and livebirth.

resultsPatient characteristics were similar across seasons. As expected, temperature and day length varied by season. When compared with cycles started during winter, there was no difference in the age-adjusted odds of livebirth for the other three seasons (spring: aOR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.82-1.13; summer: aOR: 1.05, 0.90-1.23; fall: aOR: 0.98, 0.84-1.15). There was a positive linear trend between temperature and odds of implantation, and clinical pregnancy (p value, test for linear trend (implantation, p = 0.02; clinical pregnancy, p = 0.01)) but no association with livebirth for temperature or day length.

conclusionsWe found that season at oocyte retrieval was not associated with livebirth, contrary to patterns seen in naturally conceived populations. However, our data did suggest modestly higher odds of clinical pregnancy for retrievals in June and July, and that higher temperature at time of retrieval was associated with higher odds of clinical pregnancy but not livebirth.

Indexed as

Fertilization in VitroAbortion, SpontaneousAdultBirth RateEmbryo ImplantationEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansInfertilityLive BirthOocyte RetrievalOvulation InductionPregnancyPregnancy RateSeasonsTemperatureARTDay lengthHeatIVFLivebirthPregnancySeasonSeasonal variationTemperature

Identifiers

PMID32789586
PMCPMC7550498
OpenAlexW3048764576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.